Cited by 82Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Do personality disorders exist? On the validity of the concept and its cognitive‐behavioral formulation and treatment

Arntz, Arnoud·1999·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Since the introduction of personality disorders as important diagnostic categories in the DSM-III [APA (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association] the concept of personality disorder (PD) has met both skepticism and enthusiasm. This paper addresses criticisms, reviews theoretical and empirical evidence for the concept of personality disorders (PD), critically discusses widespread clinical ideas about PDs, and reviews cognitive-behavioral models and treatments of PDs. It is concluded that there is enough evidence for the usefulness of PDs as diagnostic categories. A confirmatory factor analysis for instance yielded very reasonable evidence for the categories hypothesized by the DSM. Contradicting widespread ideas, research indicates that PDs are not a contraindication for cognitive-behavioral treatments of axis-I problems, and that there are even indications that PD pathology itself can be successfully treated using modified CBT methods. In stark contrast to the generally rich empirical history of CBT, research on cognitive models and treatment of PDs is virtually absent. However, the sparse attempts indicate that cognitive models may be fruitful in this area. Future research should be directed at further developing and testing cognitive conceptualizations and treatment models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00052-2

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arntz, A.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Arntz, Arnoud
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07
Volume
37
Pages
S97-S134
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051469220
Cited by
82
References
72
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
personality disorders, diagnostic validity, DSM-III, cognitive behavioral therapy, confirmatory factor analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review