Cited by 83Temporomandibular Joint DisordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationDental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

The relative efficacy of three cognitive-behavioral treatment approaches to temporomandibular disorders

Mishra, Kiran D., Gatchel, Robert J., Gardea, Margaret A.·2000·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of different biopsychosocial treatment conditions on patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder. Ninety-four patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder were assigned to either a biofeedback treatment group, a cognitive-behavioral skills training (CBST) treatment group, a combined (combination of biofeedback/CBST) treatment group, or a no-treatment control group. Pain scores were analyzed pretreatment and posttreatment to determine group and within-subjects treatment effects. Results demonstrated that, in terms of a self-reported pain score, all three treatment groups had significantly decreased pain scores from pretreatment to posttreatment, while the no-treatment group did not. Moreover, patients in the biofeedback group were the most significantly improved compared to the no-treatment group. Finally, participants in the three treatment groups displayed significant improvement in mood states.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005562126071

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishra, K. D., Gatchel, R. J., & Gardea, M. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2000-06
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
293-309
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2102580051
Cited by
83
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K02MH001107, K02 MH01107)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R0I DE10713)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, chronic pain, biofeedback, cognitive-behavioral skills training, treatment efficacy, pain scores, mood states, biopsychosocial treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Biofeedback, Psychology, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review