The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Inflexibility Among Ruminators and Nonruminators
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“EF deficits have been associated with higher levels of rumination and greater EF deficits in individuals with depression have been associated with higher levels of rumination (Davis and Nolen-Hoeksema 2000; Joormann and Gotlib 2008).”
From Executive Function Deficits in Daily Life Prospectively Predict Increases in Depressive Symptoms (2014) · cites this paper as Davis and Nolen-Hoeksema 2000
In the citing paper
“Ruminators persisted in performing the task according to the old rule despite receiving feedback that their matches were incorrect, suggesting a lack of cognitive flexibility.”
From Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective: The impaired disengagement hypothesis (2011) · cites this paper as Davis & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000
In the citing paper
“In this study, ruminators did not differ from nonruminators on other measures of working memory or task switching, such as a backward digit span.”
From Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective: The impaired disengagement hypothesis (2011) · cites this paper as Davis & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000
In the citing paper
“An early study by Davis and Nolen-Hoeksema (2000) showed that ruminators versus non-ruminators committed more perserverative errors on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task.”
From Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective: The impaired disengagement hypothesis (2011) · cites this paper as Davis & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.4.569 · Cited by 4,529
Self-citationNolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115 · Cited by 3,276
Self-citationWisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual – Revised and Expanded
Heaton, R. K., Chelune, C., Talley, J., Kay, G., & Curtiss, G. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,975
Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. (1948) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0059831 · Cited by 2,244
Screening Depressed Patients in Family Practice
Beck, A. T., & Beck, R. W. (1972) · Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.1080/00325481.1972.11713319 · Cited by 1,836
Effects of self-focused rumination on negative thinking and interpersonal problem solving.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen–Hoeksema, S. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.176 · Cited by 1,221
Self-citationResponse styles and the duration of episodes of depressed mood.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Morrow, J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1993) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.102.1.20 · Cited by 1,212
Self-citationRuminative coping with depressed mood following loss.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L. E., & Larson, J. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.92 · Cited by 932 · cited 6×
“…to ruminate about their depressive symptoms 1 month after their loss were more severely depressed 6 months after their loss than bereaved people who did not tend to ruminate, even after taking into account initial levels of depressive symptoms at 1 month post-loss (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1994).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, L. L. (1949). SRA Primary Mental Abilities Test. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
- Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised: Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x · Cited by 5,172
“We found that people who score high on our self-report scale of rumination show more perseverative errors on the Wisconsin Card Sort Task than do people who score low on rumination, even after controlling for group differences in levels of depression (Davis & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCognition and Depression: Current Status and Future Directions
Gotlib, I. H., & Joormann, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131305 · Cited by 2,420
“Davis & Nolen-Hoeksema (2000) reported that ruminators made more errors on the WCST than did nonruminators.”
BackgroundConstructive and unconstructive repetitive thought
Watkins, E. R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163 · Cited by 2,421
Emotion regulation in depression: Relation to cognitive inhibition
Joormann, J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930903407948 · Cited by 1,356
“For example, Davis and Nolen-Hoeksema (2000) used the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task and found that, compared to non-ruminators, ruminators made more perseverative errors, regardless of their level of depressive symptomatology.”
Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience
Dajani, D. R., & Uddin, L. Q. (2015) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003 · Cited by 1,046
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, R. N., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davis, Robert N.
- Venue
- Cognitive Therapy and Research
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 699-711
- ISSN
- 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2819
- OpenAlex
- W2169563916
- Cited by
- 581
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- rumination, cognitive flexibility, perseveration, cognitive inflexibility, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, perseverative errors, set maintenance, depressive episodes, dysphoric mood, sex differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
