Cited by 8,070Advanced Optimization Algorithms ResearchAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization AlgorithmsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions

Jones, Donald R., Schonlau, Matthias, Welch, William J.·1998·Journal of Global Optimization

DOI 10.1023/a:1008306431147

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1008306431147

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Numerical recipes in Pascal: the art of scientific computing
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5158 · Cited by 12,040
STATISTICS FOR SPATIAL DATA
Cressie, N. (1992) · Terra Nova · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00605.x · Cited by 9,139
A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271432 · Cited by 8,270
Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN
Vetterling, W. T., Teukolsky, S. A., Press, W. H., & Flannery, B. P. (1988) · Cited by 7,701
A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755 · Cited by 7,463
Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments
Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., & Wynn, H. P. (1989) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177012413 · Cited by 6,960
Self-citation
Statistics for Experimenters
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Statistics for Spatial Data
Cressie, N. A. C. (1993) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119115151 · Cited by 6,507
5. Statistics for Spatial Data
Rees, M., & Cressie, N. (1993) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2982871 · Cited by 4,983
Principles of geostatistics
Matheron, G. (1963) · Economic Geology · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 · Cited by 4,851

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Dixon, L. C. W. and Szego, G. P. (1978), The global optimisation problem: an introduction, in L. C. W. Dixon and G. P. Szego (eds.), Towards Global Optimisation, Vol. 2, pp. 1–15. North Holland, Amsterdam.
d optimization when probes are expensive: the GROPE algorithm. Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 1, pp. 577-582, Chicago.
Mockus, J., Tiesis, V. and Zilinskas, A. (1978), The application of Bayesian methods for seeking the extremum, in L. C. W. Dixon and G. P. Szego (eds.), Towards Global Optimisation, Vol.2, pp. 117–129. North Holland, Amsterdam.
Sacks, J. and Ylvisaker, D. (1970), Statistical designs and integral approximation, in R. Pyke (ed.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Biennial Seminar of the Canadian Mathematical Congress, pp. 115–136, Canadian Mathematical Congress, Montreal.

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,004

RECIFE-MILP: An Effective MILP-Based Heuristic for the Real-Time Railway Traffic Management Problem
Pellegrini, P., Marlière, G., Pesenti, R., & Rodríguez, J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2015.2414294 · Cited by 97
Enhanced Kriging leave-one-out cross-validation in improving model estimation and optimization
Pang, Y., Wang, Y., Lai, X., Zhang, S., Liang, P., & Song, X. (2023) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116194 · Cited by 97
Evolutionary Optimization of Expensive Multiobjective Problems With Co-Sub-Pareto Front Gaussian Process Surrogates
Luo, J., Gupta, A., Ong, Y.-S., & Wang, Z. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2018.2811761 · Cited by 96
COSE: Configuring Serverless Functions using Statistical Learning
Akhtar, N., Raza, A., Ishakian, V., & Matta, I. (2020) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infocom41043.2020.9155363 · Cited by 96
Realization of full and directional band gap design by non-gradient topology optimization in acoustic metamaterials
Zhang, X., Xing, J., Liu, P., Luo, Y., & Kang, Z. (2020) · Extreme Mechanics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.eml.2020.101126 · Cited by 96
Efficient Uncertainty Quantification Using Gradient-Enhanced Kriging
Dwight, R. P., & Han, Z. (2009) · AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (SDM) · doi:10.2514/6.2009-2276 · Cited by 96
APRIL: Active Preference Learning-Based Reinforcement Learning
Akrour, R., Schoenauer, M., & Sebag, M. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33486-3_8 · Cited by 95
Advantages of surrogate models for architectural design optimization
Wortmann, T., Costa, A., Nannicini, G., & Schroepfer, T. (2015) · Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing · doi:10.1017/s0890060415000451 · Cited by 99
Democratizing Data Science through Interactive Curation of ML Pipelines
Shang, Z., Zgraggen, E., Buratti, B., Kossmann, F., Eichmann, P., Chung, Y., Binnig, C., Upfal, E., & Kraska, T. (2019) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3299869.3319863 · Cited by 95
AutoML for Multi-Label Classification: Overview and Empirical Evaluation
Wever, M., Tornede, A., Mohr, F., & Hüllermeier, E. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3051276 · Cited by 95
Multiple Penalties and Multiple Local Surrogates for Expensive Constrained Optimization
Li, G., & Zhang, Q. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2021.3066606 · Cited by 95
A strategy assisted machine learning to process multi-objective optimization for improving mechanical properties of carbon steels
Diao, Y., Yan, L., & Gao, K. (2021) · Journal of Material Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.004 · Cited by 95
Machine learning accelerates the investigation of targeted MOFs: Performance prediction, rational design and intelligent synthesis
Lin, J., Liu, Z., Guo, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, T., Xue, X., Li, R., Feng, S., Wang, L., Liu, J., et al. (2023) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2023.101802 · Cited by 101
A Frequentist Approach to Computer Model Calibration
Wong, R. K. W., Storlie, C. B., & Lee, T. C. M. (2016) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/rssb.12182 · Cited by 95
Surrogate-Based Optimization of Expensive Flowsheet Modeling for Continuous Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Boukouvala, F., & Ierapetritou, M. (2013) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation · doi:10.1007/s12247-013-9154-1 · Cited by 97
Comparing error estimation measures for polynomial and kriging approximation of noise-free functions
Goel, T., Hafkta, R. T., & Shyy, W. (2008) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-008-0290-z · Cited by 95
Confidence Intervals for Projections of Partially Identified Parameters
Kaido, H., Molinari, F., & Stoye, J. (2019) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta14075 · Cited by 104
A hybrid algorithm for reliability analysis combining Kriging and subset simulation importance sampling
Tong, C., Sun, Z., Zhao, Q., Wang, Q., & Wang, S. (2015) · Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12206-015-0717-6 · Cited by 94
Bayesian adaptive dual control of deep brain stimulation in a computational model of Parkinson’s disease
Grado, L. L., Johnson, M. D., & Netoff, T. I. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006606 · Cited by 94
A survey on kriging-based infill algorithms for multiobjective simulation optimization
Gonzalez, S. R., & Nieuwenhuyse, I. V. (2019) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2019.104869 · Cited by 94
Overview of Gaussian process based multi-fidelity techniques with variable relationship between fidelities, application to aerospace systems
Brevault, L., Balesdent, M., & Hebbal, A. (2020) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2020.106339 · Cited by 94
From active learning to deep reinforcement learning: Intelligent active flow control in suppressing vortex-induced vibration
Zheng, C., Ji, T., Xie, F., Zhang, X., Zheng, H., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0052524 · Cited by 94
A kriging method for the solution of nonlinear programs with black‐box functions
Davis, E., & Ierapetritou, M. (2007) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.11228 · Cited by 94
Simulation optimization via kriging: a sequential search using expected improvement with computing budget constraints
Quan, N., Yin, J., Ng, S. H., & Lee, L. H. (2013) · IIE Transactions · doi:10.1080/0740817x.2012.706377 · Cited by 94
Optimization of injection molding process parameters using integrated artificial neural network model and expected improvement function method
Shi, H., Gao, Y., & Wang, X. (2009) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2346-7 · Cited by 94
Feasibility analysis of black-box processes using an adaptive sampling Kriging-based method
Boukouvala, F., & Ierapetritou, M. (2011) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.06.005 · Cited by 94
UQpy: A general purpose Python package and development environment for uncertainty quantification
Olivier, A., Giovanis, D. G., Aakash, B. S., Chauhan, M., Vandanapu, L., & Shields, M. D. (2020) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101204 · Cited by 94
Jointly Learning to Construct and Control Agents using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Schaff, C., Yunis, D., Chakrabarti, A., & Walter, M. R. (2019) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2019.8793537 · Cited by 96
Calibration after bootstrap for accurate uncertainty quantification in regression models
Palmer, G., Du, S., Politowicz, A. L., Emory, J. P., Yang, X., Gautam, A., Gupta, G., Li, Z., Jacobs, R. M., & Morgan, D. D. (2022) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00794-8 · Cited by 106
Active Learning and Bayesian Optimization: A Unified Perspective to Learn with a Goal
Fiore, F. D., Nardelli, M., & Mainini, L. (2024) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10064-z · Cited by 113
Surrogate modeling-based optimization of SAGD processes
Queipo, N. V., Goicochea, J. V., & Pintos, S. A. (2002) · Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0920-4105(02)00167-5 · Cited by 93
Comparison of Adaptive Sampling Methods for Generation of Surrogate Aerodynamic Models
Mackman, T., Allen, C. B., Ghoreyshi, M., & Badcock, K. J. (2013) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j051607 · Cited by 94
Accelerating the Numerical Generation of Aerodynamic Models for Flight Simulation
Ghoreyshi, M., Badcock, K. J., & Woodgate, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Aircraft · doi:10.2514/1.39626 · Cited by 93
Data Mining of Pareto-Optimal Transonic Airfoil Shapes Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition
Oyama, A., Nonomura, T., & Fujii, K. (2010) · Journal of Aircraft · doi:10.2514/1.c000264 · Cited by 93
Evolutionary Model Type Selection for Global Surrogate Modeling
Gorissen, D., Dhaene, T., & Turck, F. D. (2009) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · doi:10.5555/1577069.1755854 · Cited by 93
Simulation optimization using metamodels
Barton, R. R. (2009) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc.2009.5429328 · Cited by 93
Meta-Modeling in Multiobjective Optimization
Knowles, J. D., & Nakayama, H. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3_10 · Cited by 95
Time-variant reliability analysis using the parallel subset simulation
Du, W., Luo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.10.016 · Cited by 92
Physics-informed CoKriging: A Gaussian-process-regression-based multifidelity method for data-model convergence
Yang, X., Barajas‐Solano, D. A., Tartakovsky, G., & Tartakovsky, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.06.041 · Cited by 92
Training Neural Nets To Learn Reactive Potential Energy Surfaces Using Interactive Quantum Chemistry in Virtual Reality
Amabilino, S., Bratholm, L. A., Bennie, S. J., Vaucher, A. C., Reiher, M., & Glowacki, D. R. (2019) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.9b01006 · Cited by 92
Simulated Annealing Algorithms for Continuous Global Optimization
Locatelli, M. (2002) · Nonconvex optimization and its applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5362-2_6 · Cited by 92
Multiobjective Optimization on a Budget of 250 Evaluations
Knowles, J. D., & Hughes, E. J. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_13 · Cited by 92
Optimizing the design of a bioabsorbable metal stent using computer simulation methods
Grogan, J. A., Leen, S. B., & McHugh, P. E. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.010 · Cited by 92
Energy and cost estimates for capturing CO2 from a dry flue gas using pressure/vacuum swing adsorption
Susarla, N., Haghpanah, R., Karimi, I. A., Farooq, S., Rajendran, A., Tan, L. S. C., & Lim, J. S. T. (2015) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2015.06.033 · Cited by 94
Learning hyperparameter optimization initializations
Wistuba, M., Schilling, N., & Schmidt-Thieme, L. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2015.7344817 · Cited by 107
Update 1 of: Sensitivity Analysis for Chemical Models
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Tarantola, S., & Campolongo, F. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200301u · Cited by 92
Challenges with Structural Life Forecasting Using Realistic Mission Profiles
Gockel, B., Tudor, A., Brandyberry, M., Penmetsa, R., & Tuegel, E. (2012) · 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA · doi:10.2514/6.2012-1813 · Cited by 91
Understanding the Effect of Hyperparameter Optimization on Machine Learning Models for Structure Design Problems
Du, X., Xu, H., & Zhu, F. (2021) · Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1016/j.cad.2021.103013 · Cited by 99
Quality-Diversity Optimization: A Novel Branch of Stochastic Optimization
Chatzilygeroudis, K. I., Cully, A., Vassiliades, V., & Mouret, J.-B. (2021) · Springer optimization and its applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66515-9_4 · Cited by 101
Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Computer Simulations with Multivariate Output
McFarland, J., Mahadevan, S., Romero, V., & Swiler, L. P. (2008) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.35288 · Cited by 91
Millennial timescale carbon cycle and climate change in an efficient Earth system model
Lenton, T. M., Williamson, M. S., Edwards, N. R., Marsh, R., Price, A. R., Ridgwell, A. J., Shepherd, J. G., Cox, S., & The GENIE team (2006) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0109-9 · Cited by 91
Empirical decision model learning
Lombardi, M., Milano, M., & Bartolini, A. (2016) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2016.01.005 · Cited by 90
Deep clustering of protein folding simulations
Bhowmik, D., Gao, S. B., Young, M. T., & Ramanathan, A. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2507-5 · Cited by 87
Statistical Analysis and Discovery of Heterogeneous Catalysts Based on Machine Learning from Diverse Published Data
Suzuki, K., Toyao, T., Maeno, Z., Takakusagi, S., Shimizu, K., & Takigawa, I. (2019) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201900971 · Cited by 92
An efficient surrogate-assisted particle swarm optimization algorithm for high-dimensional expensive problems
Cai, X., Qiu, H., Gao, L., Jiang, C., & Shao, X. (2019) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.104901 · Cited by 89
Efficient adaptive Kriging-based reliability analysis combining new learning function and error-based stopping criterion
Yi, J., Zhou, Q., Cheng, Y., & Liu, J. (2020) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-020-02622-3 · Cited by 90
Data-centric Engineering: integrating simulation, machine learning and statistics. Challenges and opportunities
Pan, I., Mason, L. R., & Matar, O. K. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2021.117271 · Cited by 98
Design Space of Pharmaceutical Processes Using Data-Driven-Based Methods
Boukouvala, F., Muzzio, F. J., & Ierapetritou, M. (2010) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation · doi:10.1007/s12247-010-9086-y · Cited by 90
A NEW AND FLEXIBLE METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING DESIGNS FOR COMPUTER EXPERIMENTSPreprint
Lin, C. D., Bingham, D., & Sitter, Y. R. (2016) · Cited by 90
Global Convergence of Radial Basis Function Trust-Region Algorithms for Derivative-Free Optimization
Wild, S. M., & Shoemaker, C. A. (2013) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/120902434 · Cited by 89
Kriging metamodel global optimization of clinching joining processes accounting for ductile damage
Roux, É., & Bouchard, P.-O. (2013) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.018 · Cited by 89
Surrogate-assisted multicriteria optimization: Complexities, prospective solutions, and business case
Allmendinger, R., Emmerich, M., Hakanen, J., Jin, Y., & Rigoni, E. (2017) · Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis · doi:10.1002/mcda.1605 · Cited by 89
Bayesian optimization of a hybrid system for robust ocean wave features prediction
Cornejo-Bueno, L. M., Garrido‐Merchán, E. C., Hernández-Lobato, D., & Salcedo‐Sanz, S. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.025 · Cited by 93
Probability-Adaptive Kriging in n-Ball (PAK-Bn) for reliability analysis
Kim, J., & Song, J. (2020) · Structural Safety · doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101924 · Cited by 89
A beginner's guide to tuning methods
Montero, E., Riff, M.-C., & Neveu, B. (2014) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.12.017 · Cited by 89
Bayesian Analysis of Hierarchical Multifidelity Codes
Gratiet, L. L. (2013) · SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification · doi:10.1137/120884122 · Cited by 89
Clustered multiple generalized expected improvement: A novel infill sampling criterion for surrogate models
Ponweiser, W., Wagner, T., & Vincze, M. (2008) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2008.4631273 · Cited by 89
Bayesian Gaussian processes for sequential prediction, optimisation and quadrature
Osborne, M. A., & Osborne, M. A. (2010) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · doi:10.5287/ora-2npdxrpax · Cited by 90
Portfolio Allocation for Bayesian OptimizationPreprint
Brochu, E., Hoffman, M. W., & de Freitas, N. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1009.5419 · Cited by 89
Hierarchical Knowledge Gradient for Sequential Sampling
Mes, M., Powell, W. B., & Frazier, P. I. (2011) · doi:10.5555/1953048.2078200 · Cited by 88
An active-learning method based on multi-fidelity Kriging model for structural reliability analysis
Yi, J., Wu, F., Zhou, Q., Cheng, Y., Ling, H., & Liu, J. M. (2020) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-020-02678-1 · Cited by 88
Time-variant system reliability analysis method for a small failure probability problem
Qian, H.-M., Li, Y., & Huang, H. (2020) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.107261 · Cited by 88
Comparison of Gaussian process modeling software
Erickson, C., Ankenman, B. E., & Sanchez, S. M. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.002 · Cited by 88
An efficient machine learning approach to establish structure-property linkages
Jung, J., Yoon, J. I., Park, H. K., Kim, J. Y., & Kim, H. S. (2018) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.034 · Cited by 88
Global optimization of Lipschitz functionsPreprint
Malherbe, C., & Vayatis, N. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.02628 · Cited by 88
Cokriging for Robust Design Optimization
Keane, A. J. (2012) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j051391 · Cited by 86
Dynamic origin-destination matrix calibration for large-scale network simulators
Osorio, C. (2018) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.09.023 · Cited by 88
Low-Reynolds-number airfoil design optimization using deep-learning-based tailored airfoil modes
Li, J., Zhang, M., Tay, C. M. J., Liu, N., Cui, Y., Chew, S. C., & Khoo, B. C. (2021) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2021.107309 · Cited by 87
Evolutionary Algorithms for Parameter Optimization—Thirty Years Later
Bäck, T., Kononova, A. V., van Stein, B., Wang, H., Antonov, K., Kalkreuth, R., de Nobel, J., Vermetten, D., de Winter, R., & Ye, F. (2023) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/evco_a_00325 · Cited by 104
Atomistically informed crystal plasticity model for body-centered cubic iron
Koester, A., Ma, A., & Hartmaier, A. (2012) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.053 · Cited by 87
A surrogate-based particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving optimization problems with expensive black box functions
Tang, Y., Chen, J., & Wei, J. (2012) · Engineering Optimization · doi:10.1080/0305215x.2012.690759 · Cited by 87
Multiobjective optimization of expensive-to-evaluate deterministic computer simulator models
Svenson, J. D., & Santner, T. J. (2015) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2015.08.011 · Cited by 87
A novel feasibility analysis method for black‐box processes using a radial basis function adaptive sampling approach
Wang, Z., & Ierapetritou, M. (2016) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.15362 · Cited by 87
Hybrid and adaptive meta-model-based global optimization
Gu, J., Li, G. Y., & Dong, Z. (2011) · Engineering Optimization · doi:10.1080/0305215x.2011.564768 · Cited by 86
Sequential surrogate modeling for efficient finite element model updating
Jin, S.-S., & Jung, H. (2016) · Computers & Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.02.005 · Cited by 86
Gaussian process emulators for computer experiments with inequality constraints: Gaussian process emulators with inequality constraints
Maatouk, H., & Bay, X. (2017) · HAL · doi:10.1007/s11004-017-9673-2 · Cited by 86
Development of a standard calibration procedure for the DEM parameters of cohesionless bulk materials – Part II: Efficient optimization-based calibration
Richter, C., Rößler, T., Kunze, G., Katterfeld, A., & Will, F. (2019) · Powder Technology · doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.052 · Cited by 92
A surrogate-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with dimension-reduction for production optimization
Zhao, M., Zhang, K., Chen, G., Zhao, X., Yao, C., Sun, H. X., Huang, Z., & Yao, J. P. (2020) · Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107192 · Cited by 86
Machine-learning-assisted fabrication: Bayesian optimization of laser-induced graphene patterning using in-situ Raman analysis
Wahab, H., Jain, V., Tyrrell, A. S., Seas, M., Kotthoff, L., & Johnson, P. A. (2020) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.087 · Cited by 86
An efficient Kriging based method for time-dependent reliability based robust design optimization via evolutionary algorithm
Zafar, T., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2020) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113386 · Cited by 86
Online-to-offline mobile charging system for electric vehicles: Strategic planning and online operation
Tang, P., He, F., Lin, X., & Li, M. (2020) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102522 · Cited by 86
Bayesian‐optimized unsupervised learning approach for structural damage detection
Eltouny, K., & Liang, X. P. (2021) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12680 · Cited by 86
Multiple-Surrogate Approach to Helicopter Rotor Blade Vibration Reduction
Glaz, B. J., Goel, T., Liu, L., Friedmann, P. P., & Haftka, R. T. (2008) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.40291 · Cited by 86
Using response surfaces and expected improvement to optimize snake robot gait parameters
Tesch, M., Schneider, J., & Choset, H. (2011) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2011.6095076 · Cited by 86
An experimental investigation of model-based parameter optimisation
Hutter, F., Hoos, H. H., Leyton‐Brown, K., & Murphy, K. P. (2009) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/1569901.1569940 · Cited by 86
Inventory routing for dynamic waste collection
Mes, M., Schutten, J. M. J., & Rivera, A. E. P. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.011 · Cited by 86
Microeconometrics with partial identification
(2020) · Handbook of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/bs.hoe.2020.05.002 · Cited by 99
Construction and optimization of complex surface‐reaction mechanisms
Aghalayam, P., Park, Y. K., & Vlachos, D. G. (2000) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690461013 · Cited by 86
Vecchia Approximations of Gaussian-Process Predictions
Katzfuss, M., Guinness, J., Gong, W., & Zilber, D. (2020) · Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1007/s13253-020-00401-7 · Cited by 85
Scalable Hyperparameter Transfer Learning
Perrone, V., Jenatton, R., Seeger, M., & Archambeau, C. (2018) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 85

Authors: Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J.
Affiliations: General Motors (United States) (US)
National Institute of Statistical Sciences (US)
University of Waterloo (CA)
ORCID: Jones, Donald R.
Schonlau, Matthias
Venue: Journal of Global Optimization
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1998-12
Volume: 13
Issue: 4
Pages: 455-492
ISSN: 0925-5001 (ISSN-L)
1573-2916
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008306431147
OpenAlex: W1510052597
Cited by: 8,070
References: 34
Citations by year: 2026: 730 · 2025: 661 · 2024: 601 · 2023: 599 · 2022: 636 · 2021: 659 · 2020: 612 · 2019: 548 · 2018: 458 · 2017: 369 · 2016: 370 · 2015: 284 · 2014: 255 · 2013: 219 · 2012: 215
FWCI: 7.84
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
Locations: Journal of Global Optimization (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Keywords: expensive black-box functions, global optimization, response surface methodology, surrogate models, stopping rules, exploration-exploitation balance, prediction error, engineering design optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks