Cited by 45Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Hyperactivity in Children: A Focus on Genetic Research and Psychological Theories

Kuntsi, Jonna, Stevenson, Jim·2000·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Abstract

Hyperactivity has attracted a large amount of research interest in recent years. Here we review developments in genetic research and in research testing psychological theories of the condition. Family, adoptee and twin studies indicate a strong role for genetic factors in the etiology of hyperactivity. Evidence is emerging also from molecular genetic studies, implicating specific genes that may be involved. At the level of cognitive functioning, a divided, focused or sustained attention deficit does not seem to be a 'core' deficit in hyperactivity. Although children with hyperactivity often perform poorly on certain executive function tasks, there is disagreement about the interpretation of these findings. The association reported in some studies between a slow inhibitory process and hyperactivity may reflect a generally slow, variable in speed and inaccurate pattern of responding. Hypotheses about psychological mechanisms such as state regulation or delay aversion provide alternative, and particularly encouraging, interpretations of the findings. We discuss the possible integration of the two lines of research--those of genetic research and research on psychological mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1009580718281

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some researchers suggest a divided, focused or sustained attention deficit as a core deficit in hyperactivity.

    “Some suggest 'a divided, focused or sustained attention deficit' (Kuntsi and Stevenson, 2000).”
  • An association between a slow inhibitory process and hyperactivity may reflect a generally slow, variable in speed and inaccurate pattern of responding.

    “Others have suggested an association 'between a slow inhibitory process and hyperactivity may reflect a generally slow, variable in speed and inaccurate pattern of responding' (Kuntsi and Stevenson, 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuntsi, J., & Stevenson, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Published
2000-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
OpenAlex
W1590810231
Cited by
45
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
hyperactivity, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, genetic etiology, heritability, family studies, twin studies, molecular genetics, executive function, attention deficits, inhibitory control, government regulation, delay aversion, children
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Avoidance Learning, Child, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Models, Psychological, Twin Studies as Topic, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review