CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improved Modeling of Elevation Error with Geostatistics

Fisher, Peter·1998·GeoInformatica
DOI 10.1023/a:1009717704255
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1009717704255

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. T.J. Davis and C.P. Keller. “Modeling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and Monte Carlo simulation: slope stability prediction,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 11:409–434, 1997. · DOI · Paper page
  2. C.V. Deutsch and A.G. Journel. GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and Users Guide, University Press: Oxford, 1992.
  3. DCDSTF (Digital Cartographic Data Standards Task Force), “The proposed standard for digital cartographic data,” American Cartographer, Vol. 15:9–140, 1988. · DOI
  4. A.A. Elassal and V.M. Caruso. “USGS Digital Cartographic Data Standards: Digital Elevation Models,” USGS Circular 895-B, Reston, Virginia, 1983. · DOI
  5. E. Englund. “Spatial simulation: Environmental applications,” in M.F. Goodchild, B.Q. Parks and L.T. Steyaert (Eds.), Environmental Modeling and GIS, Oxford University Press: New York, 432–437, 1993.
  6. P.F. Fisher. “First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: the accuracy of the viewable area,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 57:1321–1327, 1991.
  7. P.F. Fisher. “Modeling soil map-unit inclusions by Monte Carlo simulation,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 5:193–208, 1991. · DOI
  8. P.F. Fisher. “First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: simulating the fuzzy viewshed,”Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 58:345–352, 1992.
  9. P.F. Fisher. “Algorithm and implementation uncertainty in viewshed analysis,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 7-4:331–374, 1993. · DOI · Paper page
  10. P.F. Fisher. “Probable and fuzzy models of the viewshed operation,” in M. Worboys (Ed.), Innovations in GIS 1, Taylor & Francis: London, 161–175, 1994
  11. P.F. Fisher. “Reconsideration of the viewshed function in terrain modeling,” Geographical Systems, Vol. 3-1:33–58, 1996.
  12. M.F. Goodchild. “Algorithm 9: Simulation of autocorrelation for aggregate data,” Environment and Planning A, Vol. 12:1073–1081, 1980. · DOI
  13. M.F. Goodchild. Spatial Autocorrelation, CATMOG 47, GeoBooks: Norwich, 1986.
  14. M.F. Goodchild. “Attribute Accuracy,” in S.C. Guptill and J. Morrison (Eds.), Elements of Spatial Data Quality, Oxford: Pergamon, 59–79, 1996.
  15. M.F. Goodchild, S. Guoqing, and Y. Shiren. “Development and test of an error model for categorical data,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 6:87–103, 1992. · DOI
  16. M.F. Goodchild and G.J. Hunter. “A simple positional accuracy measure for linear features,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 11:299–306, 1997. · DOI
  17. P. Goovaerts. Geostatistics for Natural Resource Evaluation. University Press: Oxford, 1997. · DOI
  18. G.J. Hunter and M.F. Goodchild. “Modeling the uncertainty of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases” Geographical Analysis, Vol. 29-1:35–49, 1997. · DOI
  19. R.E. Huss and M.A. Pumar. “Effect of database errors on intervisibility estimation,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 63:415–424, 1997.
  20. A. Journel. “Modeling uncertainty and spatial dependence: Stochastic imaging,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 10:517–522, 1996. · DOI
  21. D.P. Lanter and H. Veregin. “A research paradigm for propagating error in layer-based GIS, ” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 58:825–833, 1992.
  22. J. Lee, P.K. Snyder, and P.F. Fisher. “Modeling the effect of data errors on feature extraction from digital elevation models,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 58-10:1461–1467, 1992.
  23. Z. Li. “On the measure of digital terrain model accuracy,” Photogrammetric Record, Vol. 12-72:873–877, 1988. · DOI
  24. C.G. Monckton. “An investigation into the spatial structure of error in digital elevation data,” in M. Worboys (Ed.), Innovations in GIS 1, Taylor & Francis: London, 201–211, 1994.
  25. S. Openshaw, M. Charlton, and S. Carver. “Error propagation: A Monte Carlo simulation,” in I. Masser, and M. Blakemore (Eds.), Handling Geographical Information: Methodology and Potential Applications, Longman: London 102–114, 1991.
  26. OS, 1:50,000 Scale Height Data User Manual. Ordnance Survey, Southampton, 1992.
  27. Y. Pannatier. Variowin: Software for Spatial Data Analysis in 2D, Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, 1996. · DOI
  28. M.M. Thompson. Maps for America, 3rd Edition, USGS: Reston, VA, 1988.
  29. R. Weibel and M. Heller. “Digital terrain modeling,” in D.J. Maguire, M.F. Goodchild, and D. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications., Vol 1, Longman: London, 269–297, 1991.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, P.
Venue
GeoInformatica
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1998-10
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
215-233
ISSN
  • 1384-6175
  • 1573-7624
DOI
10.1023/a:1009717704255
Cited by
133
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review