Cited by 53Archaeological Research and ProtectionSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

Probabilistic modelling for incorporating uncertainty in least cost path results: a postdictive roman road case study

Open access
Lewis, Joseph·2021·Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Abstract

The movement of past peoples in the landscape has been studied extensively through the use of least cost path (LCP) analysis. Although methodological issues of applying LCP analysis in archaeology have frequently been discussed, the effect of DEM error on LCP results has not been fully assessed. Due to this, the reliability of the LCP result is undermined, jeopardising how well the method can confidently be used to model past movement. To strengthen the reliability of LCP results, this research proposes the use of Monte Carlo simulation as a method for incorporating and propagating the effects of error on LCP results. Focusing on vertical error, random error fields are calculated and incorporated into the documented and reproducible LCP modelling process using the R package leastcostpath. By graphically communicating the impact of vertical error using probabilistic LCPs, uncertainty in the results can be taken into account when interpreting LCPs. The method is applied to a Roman road case study, finding that the incorporation of vertical error results in the identification of multiple ‘least cost’ routes within the landscape. Furthermore, the deviation between the roman road and the probabilistic LCP suggests that the location of the roman road was influenced by additional factors other than minimising energy expenditure. This research finds that the probabilistic LCP derived using Monte Carlo simulation is a viable method for the graphical communication of the uncertainty caused by error within the input data used within the LCP modelling process. Therefore, it is recommended that probabilistic LCPs become the default approach when modelling movement using input data that contains errors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10816-021-09522-w

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Branting, S. (2012). Seven solutions for seven problems with least cost pathways. In D. White & S. L. Surface-Evans (Eds.), Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes: Archaeological Case Studies (pp. 209–224). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  2. Codrington, T. (1919). Roman roads in Britain (3rd ed.). London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
  3. Collingwood, R. G. (1930). Five Notes. Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiqurian and Archaeological Society, 30, 116–124.
  4. Cool, H. E. M. (2007). Telling stories about Brougham, or the importance of the specialist report. In R. Hingley, S. Willis, & University of Durham (Eds.), Roman finds: context and theory: proceedings of a conference held at the University of Durham (pp. 54–58). Oxford: Oakville, CT: Oxbow; Distributed in the USA by David Brown.
  5. Harris, T. (2000). Moving GIS: exploring movements within prehistoric cultural landscapes using GIS. In G. R. Lock (Ed.), Beyond the map: archaeology and spatial technologies (pp. 116–123). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  6. Herzog, I., & Yépez, A. (2015a). Analyzing patterns of movement and of settlement in the East-Andean Mountains of Ecuador. Vienna, Austria: Presented at the Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies. November 8-10 https://www.chnt.at/wp-content/uploads/eBook_CHNT19_Herzog_Yepez.pdf. Accessed 22 December 2019.
  7. Herzog, I., & Yépez, A. (2015b). The impact of the DEM on archaeological GIS studies: a case study in Ecudaor. Vienna: Presented at the Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies 2014 (CHNT 19, 2014) https://www.chnt.at/wp-content/uploads/eBook_CHNT20_Herzog_Yepez_2015.pdf. Accessed 5 October 2020.
  8. Hindle, B. P. (1998). Roads and tracks of the Lake District (Rev. ed.). Milnthorpe: Cicerone.
  9. Kantner, J., & Hobgood, R. (2003). Digital technologies and prehistoric landscapes in the American Southwest. In M. Forte & P. R. Williams (Eds.), The reconstruction of archaeological landscapes through digital technologies: proceedings of the 1st Italy-United States workshop, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, November 1-3, 2001 (pp. 117–124). Oxford, England: Archaeopress.
  10. Nicholson, C. (1861). The annals of Kendal: being a historical and descriptive account of Kendal and the neighbourhood: with biographical sketches of many eminent personages connected with the town. London/Kendal: Whitaker & Co. https://archive.org/details/annalsofkendalbe00nich/. Accessed 22 December 2019.
  11. Shepherd, M. (2004). From Hellgill to Bridge End: aspects of economic and social change in the Upper Eden Valley, 1840 - 95. Hatfield: Univ. of Hertfordshire Press.
  12. White, D., & Surface-Evans, S. L. (Eds.). (2012). Least cost analysis of social landscapes: archaeological case studies. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  13. Whitehead, S., & Elsworth, D. W. (2008). Investigation of part of the High Street Roman Road in Kentmer. Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiqurian and Archaeological Society, 8, 241–246.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Joseph
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
Published
2021-03-27
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
911-924
ISSN
  • 1072-5369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7764
OpenAlex
W3148787158
Cited by
53
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
16.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
least-cost path analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, error propagation, digital elevation model error, vertical error, Roman roads

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review