The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Filtering: Overview of Issues, Research and Systems
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Miller, G. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219748 · Cited by 14,015
Androutsopoulos, I., Koutsias, J., Chandrinos, K. V., & Spyropoulos, C. D. (2000) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/345508.345569 · Cited by 465
Cited by
A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval
Carpineto, C., & Romano, G. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2071389.2071390 · Cited by 1,109
E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact1
Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148784 · Cited by 1,081
The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender
Cramer, H., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., van Someren, M., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., & Wielinga, B. (2008) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3 · Cited by 448
Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: a survey
Azad, H. K., & Deepak, A. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.05.009 · Cited by 313
Personalization in cultural heritage: the road travelled and the one ahead
Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T., & Petrelli, D. (2012) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9104-x · Cited by 257
Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine learning algorithm interaction
Sun, W., Nasraoui, O., & Shafto, P. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235502 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanani, U., Shapira, B., & Shoval, P.
- Venue
- User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-259
- ISSN
- 0924-1868 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1391
- OpenAlex
- W1593196131
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
