Cited by 41Human-Animal Interaction StudiesChild Therapy and DevelopmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Coping skills interventions with adolescents in anger management using animals in therapy

Hanselman, Jan L.·2001·Journal of Child and Adolescent Group Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1014802324267

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanselman, J. L.
Affiliations
Monmouth University (US)
Corresponding author
Hanselman, Jan L.
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Group Therapy
Published
2001-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
159-195
ISSN
  • 1053-0800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3467
OpenAlex
W23522335
Cited by
41
References
36
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Child and Adolescent Group Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
animal-assisted therapy, anger management, adolescents, coping strategies, cognitive behavioral therapy, group therapy, child abuse, animal cruelty, human-animal relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review