CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,140Science Education and PedagogyEvolution and Science EducationScience and Education Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry

Anderson, Ronald D.·2002·Journal of Science Teacher Education
DOI 10.1023/a:1015171124982
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Inquiry has a decades-long and persistent history as the central word used to characterize good science teaching and learning. Even at a time when a new word, constructivism, had entered the general educational lexicon as the descriptor of good education, the authors of the National Science Education Standards (NSES) chose to stay with inquiry and totally ignore the new word. But in spite of its seemingly ubiquitous use, many questions surround inquiry. What does it mean to teach science as, through, or with inquiry? Is the emphasis on science as inquiry, learning as inquiry, teaching as inquiry or all of the above? Is it an approach to science education that can be realized in the classroom or is it an idealized approach that is more theoretical than practical? Is it something that the “average” teacher can do, or is it only possible in the hands and minds of the exceptional teacher? What are the goals of its use? Does it result in greater or better learning? How does one prepare a teacher to utilize this type of science education? What barriers must be overcome to initiate such science education in the schools? What dilemmas do teachers face as they move to this form of science education? The list of questions goes on. They are of particular importance to people committed to the NSES and wanting to see these standards put into greater practice. Reformers from all categories—teachers, teacher educators, administrators, policy makers and members of the general public want to know what answers research has for such questions. Given the central role of teacher education in the process of educational reform, however, these questions are of particular interest to science teacher educators. Researchers’ pursuit of answers has resulted in an extensive literature. Defining the arena broadly, the number of studies is in the hundreds and probably more. This body of research literature is worth exploring, but it will be necessary to limit and focus. Since the NSES is at the center of current discussions of U.S. science education improvement, it is well to begin with that document and consider its use of inquiry. This beginning point, of course, does not imply that the NSES document is without problems or that is fully grounded in the latest research. It is well to remember that it is a political document, based on an attempt to find consensus among the various educational, scientific and public constituencies in the realm of science education. As a result of its wide usage, the language of the document is useful for our communication. Consideration subsequently can be given to how far research goes in answering the questions at hand. *This article is based on a commissioned paper prepared for the Center for Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education at the National Research Council.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015171124982

Cites

22 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Anderson R.D., 1996, Study of curriculum reform
  2. Heywood J., 1992, The training of student-teachers in discovery methods of instruction and learning
  3. Layman J.W., 1996, Inquiry and learning: Realizing science standards in the classroom

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, R. D.
Affiliations
University of Colorado System (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Ronald D.
Venue
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2002-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 1046-560X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1847
DOI
10.1023/a:1015171124982
OpenAlex
W1620084432
Cited by
1,140
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 71
FWCI
18.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Science Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
Keywords
National Science Education Standards, science education reform, constructivism, teacher professional development, teacher preparation, science as inquiry, teaching as inquiry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review