Cited by 110Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsPasture and Agricultural Systems

Longevity and turnover of roots in the shortgrass steppe: influence of diameter and depth

Gill, Richard A., Burke, Ingrid C., Lauenroth, William K., Milchunas, Daniel G.·2002·Plant Ecology

Abstract

We used minirhizotrons to determine patterns of root longevity and turnover for the perennial bunchgrass Bouteloua gracilis in the shortgrass steppe of eastern Colorado, USA. We hypothesized that root longevity would be partially controlled by root diameter, following previously observed patterns in woody plants. In addition, we hypothesized that root turnover would be greatest in surface soil horizons and decrease with depth due to variation in soil moisture availability and temperture. Root longevity was correlated with root diameter. Median life span of roots > 0.4 mm was approximately 320 days, while roots < 0.2 mm had a median life span of 180 days. There was approximately a 6% decrease in the likelihood of mortality with a 0.10-mm increase in root diameter, controlling for the effect of depth in the soil profile. Root length production and mortality were highest in the upper 20 cm of the soil profile and decreased with depth. However, because root length density also decreased with depth, there were no significant differences in turnover rate of root length among sampling intervals. Turnover was approximately 0.86 yr-1 based on root length production, while turnover was 0.35 yr-1 using root length mortality as a measurement of flux. The imbalance between turnover estimates may be a consequence of the time the minirhizotrons were in place prior to imaging or may result from our lack of over-winter measures of mortality. Our work suggests that Bouteloua gracilis roots have complex life history strategies, similar to woody species. Some portion of the root system is highly ephemeral, while slightly larger roots persist much longer. These differences have implications for belowground carbon and nitrogen cycles in the shortgrass steppe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015529507670

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gill, R. A., Burke, I. C., Lauenroth, W. K., & Milchunas, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gill, Richard A.
Venue
Plant Ecology
Published
2002-04
Volume
159
Issue
2
Pages
241-251
ISSN
  • 1385-0237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5052
OpenAlex
W34338265
Cited by
110
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
Keywords
root longevity, root turnover, root diameter, root depth, Bouteloua gracilis, shortgrass steppe, perennial bunchgrasses, root mortality, root length density, soil moisture, soil temperature, belowground carbon cycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review