Cited by 80RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Evaluation of adjuvants that enhance the effectiveness of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides

Hughes, J. A., Aronsohn, A. I., Avrutskaya, A. V., Juliano, R. L.·1996·Pharmaceutical Research

Abstract

Purpose A factor limiting the effectiveness of antisense (AS) deoxyoligonucleotides (ODNs) is inefficient transport to their sites of action in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus. The extent of ODN transfer from endosomes to cytosol seems to be an important determinant of ODN effects. Consequently, the development of compounds (adjuvants) that enhance endosome to cytosol transfer may be vital in AS ODN therapeutics.Methods In this report, we evaluated compounds for their potential to enhance the effects of phosphorothioate ODNs. The test system used a CHO cell line expressing the enzyme chloramphenicol acetyl-transferase (CAT) under the control of an inducible promoter. Several potential endosomal disrupting adjuvants were screened, including: (a) fusogenic peptides; (b) a pH sensitive polymer; (c) polymeric dendrimers, (d) cationic liposomes and (e) a pH sensitive surfactant N-dodecyl 2-imidazole-propionate (DIP). ODN effects were evaluated at the protein level by quantitating levels of CAT.Results The use of AS ODN in co-incubation with the GALA peptide, cationic liposomes or 5th generation dendrimers resulted in a 35-40% reduction in CAT expression. The mis-matched ODN had no effect on CAT expression. Only modest effects were observed with the other adjuvants. DIP did not increase ODN activity by itself; however, when the liposomal form was used a significant reduction (48%) in CAT activity was seen.Conclusions We found the fusogenic peptide GALA, dendrimers, as well as the liposomal form of DIP, could significantly enhance the effects of ODNs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1016044609972

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, J. A., Aronsohn, A. I., Avrutskaya, A. V., & Juliano, R. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Pharmaceutical Research
Published
1996-03
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
404-410
ISSN
  • 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-904X
OpenAlex
W60020971
Cited by
80
References
30
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmaceutical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, adjuvants, endosomal escape, phosphorothioate oligonucleotides, GALA peptide, fusogenic peptides, dendrimers, cationic liposomes, pH-responsive polymers, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter, gene delivery
MeSH terms
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Drug Synergism, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Cricetinae, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Imidazoles, Liposomes, Molecular Sequence Data, Surface-Active Agents, Transfection, Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase, Oligonucleotides, Antisense, CHO Cells, Genes, Reporter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review