The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selecting Indicator Species to Monitor Ecological Integrity: A Review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH
Dufrêne, M., & Legendre, P. (1997) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:saaist]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 7,431
Gauze, G. F. (1934) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.4489 · Cited by 3,285
Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach
NOSS, R. F. (1990) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x · Cited by 3,151
Habitat destruction and the extinction debt
Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L., & Nowak, M. A. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371065a0 · Cited by 2,844
Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities
Karr, J. R. (1981) · Fisheries · doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:aobiuf>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,695
Density as a Misleading Indicator of Habitat Quality
Horne, B. V. (1983) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3808148 · Cited by 2,406
A note on trophic complexity and community stability.
Paine, R. T. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282586 · Cited by 1,796
Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era?
Simberloff, D. (1998) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(97)00081-5 · Cited by 1,573
Avian Life History Evolution in Relation to Nest Sites, Nest Predation, and Food
Martin, T. E. (1995) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937160 · Cited by 1,561
Biological Integrity: A Long‐Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management
Karr, J. R. (1991) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/1941848 · Cited by 1,541
Cited by
Top Predators as Conservation Tools: Ecological Rationale, Assumptions, and Efficacy
Sergio, F., Caro, T., Brown, D., Clucas, B., Hunter, J., Ketchum, J., McHugh, K., & Hiraldo, F. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173545 · Cited by 670
Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation
SERGIO, F., NEWTON, I., MARCHESI, L., & PEDRINI, P. (2006) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01218.x · Cited by 477
Are We Conserving What We Say We Are? Measuring Ecological Integrity within Protected Areas
PARRISH, J. D., BRAUN, D. P., & UNNASCH, R. S. (2003) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:awcwws]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 438
Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness
Wimmer, J., Towsey, M., Roe, P., & Williamson, I. (2013) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/12-2088.1 · Cited by 272
Agri-Environmental Indicators to Assess Cropping and Farming Systems. A Review
Bockstaller, C., Guichard, L., Makowski, D., Aveline, A., Girardin, P., & Plantureux, S. (2008) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1051/agro:2007052 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Carignan, V., & Villard, M.-A.
- Venue
- Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-61
- ISSN
- 0167-6369 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2959
- OpenAlex
- W150896473
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selecting Indicator Species to Monitor Ecological Integrity: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1016136723584
- The paper
- Carignan, V., & Villard, M.-A. (2002). Selecting Indicator Species to Monitor Ecological Integrity: A Review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1016136723584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
