The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness
Open accessAbstract
Acoustic sensors can be used to estimate species richness for vocal species such as birds. They can continuously and passively record large volumes of data over extended periods. These data must subsequently be analyzed to detect the presence of vocal species. Automated analysis of acoustic data for large numbers of species is complex and can be subject to high levels of false positive and false negative results. Manual analysis by experienced surveyors can produce accurate results; however the time and effort required to process even small volumes of data can make manual analysis prohibitive. This study examined the use of sampling methods to reduce the cost of analyzing large volumes of acoustic sensor data, while retaining high levels of species detection accuracy. Utilizing five days of manually analyzed acoustic sensor data from four sites, we examined a range of sampling frequencies and methods including random, stratified, and biologically informed. We found that randomly selecting 120 one‐minute samples from the three hours immediately following dawn over five days of recordings, detected the highest number of species. On average, this method detected 62% of total species from 120 one‐minute samples, compared to 34% of total species detected from traditional area search methods. Our results demonstrate that targeted sampling methods can provide an effective means for analyzing large volumes of acoustic sensor data efficiently and accurately. Development of automated and semi‐automated techniques is required to assist in analyzing large volumes of acoustic sensor data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adhi Harmoko, S., M.Komp, Jacquard, J. M., Zuse, K., & Eniac (2005) · Cited by 18,035
Estimating the Population Size for Capture-Recapture Data with Unequal Catchability
Chao, A. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531532 · Cited by 2,450
Introduction to Algorithms, third edition
Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L., & Stein, C. (2009) · Cited by 2,309
Acoustic Communication in Birds
(1982) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03022-0 · Cited by 957
Selecting Indicator Species to Monitor Ecological Integrity: A Review
Carignan, V., & Villard, M.-A. (2002) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1023/a:1016136723584 · Cited by 828
Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal
Sueur, J., Pavoine, S., Hamerlynck, O., & Duvail, S. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004065 · Cited by 684
Kasten, E. P., Gage, S. H., Fox, J., & Joo, W. (2012) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.08.001 · Cited by 408
Detecting bird sounds in a complex acoustic environment and application to bioacoustic monitoring
Bardeli, R., Wolff, D., Kurth, F., Koch, M., Tauchert, K.-H., & Frommolt, K.-H. (2010) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.014 · Cited by 341
Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: A comparison of methods
Acevedo, M. A., Corrada-Bravo, C. J., Corrada-Bravo, H., Villanueva-Rivera, L. J., & Aide, T. M. (2009) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2009.06.005 · Cited by 317
Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation
Scott Brandes, T. (2008) · Bird Conservation International · doi:10.1017/s0959270908000415 · Cited by 295
Cited by
Ecoacoustics: the Ecological Investigation and Interpretation of Environmental Sound
Sueur, J., & Farina, A. (2015) · Biosemiotics · doi:10.1007/s12304-015-9248-x · Cited by 485
Towsey, M., Wimmer, J., Williamson, I., & Roe, P. (2014) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.007 · Cited by 369
Self-citationConnecting soundscape to landscape: Which acoustic index best describes landscape configuration?
Fuller, S., Axel, A. C., Tucker, D., & Gage, S. H. (2015) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.057 · Cited by 314
Eldridge, A., Guyot, P., Moscoso, P., Johnston, A., Eyre-Walker, Y., & Peck, M. (2018) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.012 · Cited by 209
Bioacoustic monitoring of animal vocal behavior for conservation
Teixeira, D., Maron, M., & van Rensburg, B. J. (2019) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.72 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Wimmer, J., Towsey, M., Roe, P., & Williamson, I.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1419-1428
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2067179326
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 11.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/12-2088.1
- The paper
- Wimmer, J., Towsey, M., Roe, P., & Williamson, I. (2013). Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-2088.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.