Cited by 31Educational Assessment and ImprovementPsychometric Methodologies and TestingEducational Technology and Assessment

Because every pupil counts: the success of the pupil monitoring system in The Netherlands

VLUG, KARIN F. M.·1997·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018629701040

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • National assessments take place twice a year in The Netherlands: halfway into the school year in January to February and at the end of the school year in June.

    “Key to our study design is the fact that national assessments take place twice a year in The Netherlands (40): halfway into the school year in January to February and at the end of the school year in June.”
  • The student monitoring system provides the test score data and comprises mandatory tests taken twice a year throughout primary school (ages 6 to 12).

    “The first one is the student monitoring system, which provides our test score data (40). This system comprises a series of mandatory tests that are taken twice a year throughout a child’s primary school education (ages 6 to 12 y).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VLUG, K. F. M.
Affiliations
Cito (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
VLUG, KARIN F. M.
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
1997-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
287-306
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W1527968059
Cited by
31
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
Keywords
primary education, longitudinal assessment, learning progress, psychometrics, educational software, computer-based testing, teacher feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review