CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coping with Chronic Pain: Sources of Intrinsic and Contextual Variability

Novy, Diane M., Nelson, David V., Hetzel, Roderick D., Squitieri, Paula, Kennington, Mary·1998·Journal of Behavioral Medicine
DOI 10.1023/a:1018711420797
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate intrinsic and contextual sources of coping variability among 90 patients with chronic pain. Pain coping strategies were assessed by the subscales of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Intrinsic variables included demographic characteristics and dispositional optimism. Contextual variables included pain-related variables and pain control appraisals. In univariate analyses, ethnicity was a statistically significant intrinsic source of variability for the praying and hoping coping subscale; however, comparisons between pairs of ethnic groups were not statistically significant. A multivariate perspective of the data found three independent and salient patterns of correlation between the intrinsic and contextual variables and coping subscales. These patterns of correlation accounted for 96% of the total variance and were conceptualized as optimistic active coping, educated rational coping, and optimistic restricted coping. The findings raise the prospect that there are intrinsic and contextual explanations of coping variability for patients with chronic pain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018711420797

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hetzel, R. D. (1996). A primer on factor analysis with comments on patterns of practice and reporting. In Thompson, B. (ed.), Advances in Social Science Research, 4th ed., JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 175–206.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 45

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Novy, D. M., Nelson, D. V., Hetzel, R. D., Squitieri, P., & Kennington, M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1998-02
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
19-34
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
DOI
10.1023/a:1018711420797
OpenAlex
W103257827
Cited by
45
References
26
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, pain coping, dispositional optimism, ethnicity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Care Team, Sick Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review