CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 214Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceGender, Security, and Conflict

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Male and Female Recipients of Unwanted Sexual Contact in a College Student Sample: Prevalence Rates, Alcohol Use, and Depression Symptoms

Larimer, Mary E., Lydum, Amy R., Anderson, Britt K., Turner, Aaron P.·1999·Sex Roles
DOI 10.1023/a:1018807223378
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018807223378

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Abbey, A. (1991). Acquaintance rape and alcohol consumption on college campuses: How are they linked? Journal of the American College Health, 39, 165–169. · DOI
  2. Anderson, P. B., & Aymami, R. (1993). Reports of female initiation of sexual contact: Male and female differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 335–343. · DOI
  3. Baer, J. S., Stacy, A., & Larimer, M. E. (1991). Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52, 580–586. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Collins, R. L., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 189–200. · DOI
  5. Copenhaver, S., & Grauerholz,E. (1991). Sexual victimization among sorority women: Exploring the link between sexual violence and institutional practices. Sex Roles, 24, 31–41. · DOI
  6. Donat, P. L., & D'Emilio, J. (1992). A feminist rede® nition of rape and sexual assault: Historical foundations and change. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 9–22. · DOI
  7. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1996). Crime in the United States: Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  8. Hannon, R., Kuntz, T., Van Laar, S., Williams, J., & Hall, D. S. (1996). College students' judgments regarding sexual aggression during a date. Sex Roles, 35, 765–780. · DOI
  9. Kalof, L. (1993). Rape-supportive attitudes and sexual victimization experiences of sorority and nonsorority women. Sex Roles, 29, 767–780. · DOI
  10. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisnieswski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 164–170.
  11. Larimer, M. E., Irvine, D. L., Kilmer, J. R., & Marlatt, G. A. (1997). College drinking and the greek system: Examining the role of perceived norms for high risk behavior. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 587–598.
  12. Martin, P. Y., & Hummer, R. A. Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender and Society, 3, 457–473. · DOI
  13. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggre ssion in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196. · DOI
  14. Porter, J. F., & Critelli, J. W. (1992). Measurement of sexual aggre ssion in college men: A methodological analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 525–542. · DOI
  15. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Richardson, D. R.,& Hammock, G. S., (1991). Alcohol and acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechofer (Eds.) Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime. New York: Wiley.
  17. Roberts, R.E., Andrews, J.A., Lewinsohn, P.M., & Hops,H. (1990). Assessment of depression in adolescents using the Center for EpidemiologicStudiesDepressionScale. Psychological Assessments, 2, 122–128. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ross, R.R., & Allgeier, E.R. (1996). Behind the pencil/papermeasurement of sexual coercion: Interview-based clari® cation of men's interpretations of sexual experiences survey items. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1587–1616. · DOI
  19. Sayetta, R. B., & Johnson, D. P. (1980) Basic data on depressive symptomatology. (DHEW Publication No. 80–1666). Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Government Printing Of® ce.
  20. Seto, M. C., & Barbaree, H. E. (1995). The role of alcohol in sexual aggression. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 545–566. · DOI
  21. Skinner, H. A., & Allen, B. A. (1982). Alcohol dependence syndrome: Measurement and validation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 199–209. · DOI
  22. Skinner, H. A., & Horn, J. L. (1984). Alcohol Dependence Scale (ADS). Addiction Research Foundation: Toronto, Canada.
  23. Sorenson, S. B., & Siegel, J. M. (1992). Gender, ethnicity, and sexual assault: Findings from a Los Angeles study. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 93–104. · DOI
  24. Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–241. · DOI
  25. Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1991a). Male victims of acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.). Acquaintance rape: the hidden crime. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Struckman-Johnson, D., & Struckman-Johnson, C. (1991b). Men and women's acceptance of coercive sexual strate gies varied by initiator gender and couple intimacy. Sex Roles, 25, 661–676. · DOI
  27. Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1993). College men's and women' s reactions to hypothetical sexual touch varied by initiator gender and coercion level. Sex Roles, 29, 371–385. · DOI
  28. Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1994a). Men pressured and forced into sexual experiences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 93–114. · DOI
  29. Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1994b). Men's reactions to hypothetical female sexual advances: A beauty bias in response to sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 31, 387–405. · DOI
  30. Waldner-Haugrud, L. K., & Magruder, B. (1995). Male and female victimization in dating relationships: Gender differences in coercion techniques and outcomes. Violence and Victims, 10, 203–215. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Larimer, M. E., Lydum, A. R., Anderson, B. K., & Turner, A. P.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
ORCID
Venue
Sex Roles
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1999-02
Volume
40
Issue
3-4
Pages
295-308
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
DOI
10.1023/a:1018807223378
OpenAlex
W304908918
Cited by
214
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Security, and Conflict
Keywords
unwanted sexual contact, acquaintance rape, sexual coercion, sexual assault, university students, gender differences, alcohol consumption, alcohol-related negative consequences, depressive symptoms, Greek life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review