CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 601Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with Autism

Baranek, Grace T.·2002·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
DOI 10.1023/a:1020541906063
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Idiosyncratic responses to sensory stimuli and unusual motor patterns have been reported clinically in young children with autism. The etiology of these behavioral features is the subject of much speculation. Myriad sensory- and motor-based interventions have evolved for use with children with autism to address such issues; however, much controversy exists about the efficacy of such therapies. This review paper summarizes the sensory and motor difficulties often manifested in autism, and evaluates the scientific basis of various sensory and motor interventions used with this population. Implications for education and further research are described.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020541906063

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Greenspan, S., & Weider, S. (1997). Developmental patterns and outcomes in infants and children with disorders in relating and communicating. A chart review of 200 cases of children with autistic spectrum diagnoses. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 1, 87–141.
  2. Jones, V., & Prior, M. (1985). A comparison of adaptive, verbal and motor profiles of psychotic and non-psychotic subnormal children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 2, 359–377.
  3. Thelen, E., & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56 (pp. 1–98). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 601

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Baranek, G. T.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Baranek, Grace T.
ORCID
Baranek, Grace T.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-10
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
397-422
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
DOI
10.1023/a:1020541906063
OpenAlex
W1725060680
Cited by
601
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sensory processing, motor patterns, sensory interventions, motor intervention, intervention efficacy, children with autism, sensory difficulties, motor difficulties
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Patient Care Team, Psychomotor Disorders, Treatment Outcome, Early Intervention, Educational, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review