Cited by 617Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Internet survey of treatments used by parents of children with autism.

Open access
Green, Vanessa A., Pituch, Keenan A., Itchon, Jonathan, Choi, Aram, O’Reilly, Mark, Sigafoos, Jeff·2006·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

We developed an Internet survey to identify treatments used by parents of children with autism. The survey listed 111 treatments and was distributed via colleagues and through chapters of the Autism Society of America and Autism Organizations Worldwide. A total of 552 parents submitted usable returns during the 3-month survey period. On average the parents reported using seven different treatments. The number of treatments used varied as a function of the child's age and type/severity of disability within the autism spectrum. Speech therapy was the most commonly reported intervention, followed by visual schedules, sensory integration, and applied behavior analysis. In addition, 52% of parents were currently using at least one medication to treat their child, 27% were implementing special diets, and 43% were using vitamin supplements. Because parents were using a large number of treatments, many of which lack empirical support, future research should focus on understanding the decision-making processes that underlie treatment selection by parents of children with autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.12.002

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, V. A., Pituch, K. A., Itchon, J., Choi, A., O’Reilly, M., & Sigafoos, J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Green, Vanessa A.
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
70-84
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011126385
Cited by
617
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 39
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, complementary therapy, speech therapy, visual schedules, sensory integration, applied behavior analysis, special diets, vitamin supplements, treatment selection decision-making
MeSH terms
Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Humans, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review