Cited by 28Health Sciences Research and EducationEthics and bioethics in healthcareMedicine, History, and Philosophy

The Virtues of Evidence

Zarkovich, Erica, Upshur, R.E.G.·2002·Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine has been defined as the conscientious and judicious use of current best evidence in making clinical decisions. This paper will attempt to explicate the terms "conscientious" and "judicious" within the evidence-based medicine definition. It will be argued that "conscientious" and "judicious" represent virtue terms derived from virtue ethics and virtue epistemology. The identification of explicit virtue components in the definition and therefore conception of evidence-based medicine presents an important starting point in the connection between virtue theories and medicine itself. In addition, a unification of virtue theories and evidence-based medicine will illustrate the need for future research in order to combine the fields of virtue-based approaches and clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021217908383

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zarkovich, E., & Upshur, R. E. G.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Upshur, R.E.G.
Venue
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Published
2002-07
Volume
23
Issue
4-5
Pages
403-412
ISSN
  • 0166-2031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1386-7415
  • 1573-1200
OpenAlex
W2145074607
Cited by
28
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metamedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
evidence-based medicine, virtue ethics, virtue epistemology, conscientiousness, clinical decision-making, medical ethics
MeSH terms
Canada, Humans, Evidence-Based Medicine, Ethical Theory, Virtues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review