Cited by 59Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMedicine, History, and Philosophy

Clinical judgement in the era of big data and predictive analytics

Chin‐Yee, Benjamin, Upshur, Ross·2018·Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Clinical judgement is a central and longstanding issue in the philosophy of medicine which has generated significant interest over the past few decades. In this article, we explore different approaches to clinical judgement articulated in the literature, focusing in particular on data‐driven, mathematical approaches which we contrast with narrative, virtue‐based approaches to clinical reasoning. We discuss the tension between these different clinical epistemologies and further explore the implications of big data and machine learning for a philosophy of clinical judgement. We argue for a pluralistic, integrative approach, and demonstrate how narrative, virtue‐based clinical reasoning will remain indispensable in an era of big data and predictive analytics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jep.12852

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chin‐Yee, B., & Upshur, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Canada
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-13
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
638-645
ISSN
  • 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2753
OpenAlex
W2771318787
Cited by
59
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
clinical judgment, clinical reasoning, big data, predictive analytics, machine learning, clinical epistemology, narrative thinking, data-driven reasoning, philosophy of medicine
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Machine Learning, Narrative Medicine, Education, Medical, Judgment, Databases, Factual, Evidence-Based Medicine, Knowledge, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review