Cited by 123Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementAttachment and Relationship DynamicsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The nuts and bolts of behavioral observation of marital and family interaction

Margolin, Gayla, Oliver, Pamella H., Gordis, Elana B., O'Hearn, Holly Garcia, Medina, Anna Marie, Ghosh, Chandra M., Morland, Leslie·1998·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Abstract

Despite considerable discussion in the literature about the advantages of observational research and the relative benefits of different coding systems and strategies, little is written about the actual implementation of this assessment strategy. This paper presents an overall framework as well as the essential components involved in collecting (selection of task, setting, unit of analysis, and coding system) and coding (transcribing, selecting and training coders, transforming data, and analyzing reliability) of observational data. To achieve success with observational methods, we emphasize several issues, including (a) the research question as the motivator for all decisions, (b) the interrelatedness of tasks, and (c) the implications of decisions early in the process for later stages of analysis and interpretation. Investigators are encouraged to communicate the details of their observational and coding procedures so that these methods are readily accessible for purposes of replication and comparison.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1022608117322

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowing the thoughts and feelings of someone in pain impacts an observer's affective and behavioral reactions.

    “Goubert et al. 16 proposed that knowing the thoughts and feelings of someone in pain impacts an observer’s affective and behavioral reactions (i.e., expressions of empathy) to the observed person with pain.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Margolin, G., Oliver, P. H., Gordis, E. B., O'Hearn, H. G., Medina, A. M., Ghosh, C. M., & Morland, L.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Margolin, Gayla
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Published
1998-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
195-213
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
OpenAlex
W72738105
Cited by
123
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (10947, 36595)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
behavioral observation, marital interaction, family interaction, coding system, coder training, inter-rater reliability, observational data collection, unit of analysis, transcribing, replication, research design
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior, Child, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Family, Humans, Marriage, Research Design, Observer Variation, Guidelines as Topic, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review