Cited by 34Attachment and Relationship DynamicsCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Comparison of marital observational measures: the marital interaction coding system and the communication skills test

Floyd, Frank J., O'Farrell, Timothy J., Goldberg, Marianna·1987·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Comparaison des donnees obtenues par le systeme de codage des interactions conjugales (MITS) et un test des capacites de communication (CST) a partir des discussions de resolution de conflit chez 47 couples maries

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.55.3.2200

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floyd, F. J., O'Farrell, T. J., & Goldberg, M.
Affiliations
Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1987-06
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
423-429
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1981790732
Cited by
34
References
24
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
marital interaction, conflict resolution, couples, marital communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review