Cited by 75Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research TopicsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Comorbidity and Child Psychopathology: Recommendations for the Next Decade

Jensen, Peter S.·2003·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

This special section exemplifies and offers a number of important methodologic and conceptual advances that should provide investigators new tools for understanding comorbidity of child and adolescent psychopathology, including (a) the importance of making careful methodologic distinctions in how comorbidity is defined and operationalized, (b) specifying and justifying how data from different sources are combined, (c) teasing out the impact of potentially confounding risk factors that lead to symptom and syndrome overlaps, and (d) exploring the effects of time, timing, and order of disorder emergence on variable manifestations of comorbidity. These advances are much needed, but may still prove insufficient, given the daunting challenges in fully understanding comorbidity. Thus, future studies should be characterized by (a) more focused search for subgrouping factors and interactions related to the emergence of comorbidity, (b) careful exploration of setting- and/or informant-specific types of psychopathology, (c) development of studies that explore not just phenotypes and genotypes, but also environtypes and trajectory-types, (d) more discriminative use of information sources, including explicit efforts to reconcile (rather than combine) discrepant information, (e) clear descriptions and logical justification of when conjunctive, disjunctive, additive, and discriminative combinatorial approaches are used, (f) increased use of multidisciplinary research methods and teams, (g)…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023281513936

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fact that children with ADHD with various comorbid disorders participated supports the generalizability of the present results to clinical samples.

    “Rather, the fact that children with ADHD with various comorbid disorders participated in our studies supports the generalizability of the present results to clinical samples (Jensen, 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, P. S.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Peter S.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2003-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
293-300
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W99620164
Cited by
75
References
5
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
comorbidities, child and adolescent psychopathology, informant discrepancies, combinatorial methods, illness process, research design
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Psychology, Child, Forecasting, Humans, Psychopathology, Research, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review