The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknesses
Open accessAbstract
The experience-sampling (ESM) technique is a method in which recording of feelings and activities is done on-line at the moment, either at randomly selected moments or at predetermined times. This method has the advantage of being able to not only assess people’s general feelings, but to link feelings with situations, times of day, and other circumstances. Thus, ESM provides a powerful way of moving beyond simple questions about who is “happy” and who is not, to more intricate questions about when and why people experience positive and negative feelings. Compared to retrospective reports of feelings, ESM is less influenced by memory biases. ESM also allows researchers to analyze the patterning and relationships of feelings as they unfold over time. Despite the strengths and promise of this method, there are also limitations. For example, the heavy demand placed on research participants means that the sample might be biased toward highly conscientious individuals, and repeatedly reporting one’s moods might itself influence feelings. How to analyze ESM data is discussed, including the issue of how to aggregate momentary feelings into global measures of the average subjective well-being of individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.
Schwarz, N. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.2.93 · Cited by 2,846
Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M., & LARSON, R. (1987) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004 · Cited by 2,544
Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)02994-6 · Cited by 1,078 · cited 2×
“Types of Experience Sampling Under the broad umbrella of experience sampling methods, three distinct types of experience sampling exist (Reis and Gable, 2000; Wheeler and Reis, 1991). Interval-contingent sampling refers to the type of data collection in which participants complete self-reports after a designated inter…”
BackgroundThe ecology of adolescent activity and experience
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf02138940 · Cited by 781
On the "remembrance of things past": A longitudinal evaluation of the retrospective method.
Henry, B., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Langley, J., & Silva, P. A. (1994) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.92 · Cited by 642
Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.198 · Cited by 531
Reactive effects of diary self-assessment in chronic pain patients
Cruise, C. E., Broderick, J., Porter, L., Kaell, A., & Stone, A. A. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)03125-9 · Cited by 126
Diurnal Patterns of Unpleasant Mood: Associations with Neuroticism, Depression, and Anxiety
Rusting, C. L., & Larsen, R. J. (1998) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00004 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760701756946 · Cited by 2,396
Self-citationFowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a2338 · Cited by 1,990
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916508318748 · Cited by 1,963
Heron, K. E., & Smyth, J. M. (2010) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910709x466063 · Cited by 1,438
Metadata
- Authors
- Scollon, C. N., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Happiness Studies
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-34
- ISSN
- 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7780
- OpenAlex
- W2134807463
- Cited by
- 825
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.