The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customers behaving badly: a state of the art review, research agenda and implications for practitioners
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to highlight important issues in the study of dysfunctional customer behavior and to provide a research agenda to inspire, guide, and enthuse. Through a critical evaluation of existing research, the aim is to highlight key issues and to present potentially worthy avenues for future study. Design/methodology/approach: In reviewing recent and past advances in the study of customers behaving badly, an overview of existing research into customers behaving badly and addressing issues of terminology and definition is provided. Thereafter, three perspectives that provide the most opportunity and insight in studying the darker side of service dynamics are outlined. This leads to a review of some of the research design and methodological problems and issues that are faced when rigorously studying these issues. Subsequently, the paper devotes a section to the provocative idea that while dysfunctional customer behavior has many negative influences on customers, employees, and service firms, there are actually some positive functions of customers behaving badly. Findings: A research agenda is provided that is believed to identify and discuss a range of projects that comprises not only insightful theoretical contributions but is also practically relevant. Originality/value: The paper identifies a range of issues about which managers should be aware and proactively manage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Social Theory and Social Structure
Ross, E. J., & Merton, R. K. (1958) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709394 · Cited by 10,315
(1951) · Cited by 8,693
Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations
Ferguson, C. E., El-Dirghami, A., & Churchill, G. A. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151081 · Cited by 4,351
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996) · Cited by 3,558
A TYPOLOGY OF DEVIANT WORKPLACE BEHAVIORS: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING STUDY.
ROBINSON, S. L., & BENNETT, R. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256693 · Cited by 3,393
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
Warner, S. L. (1965) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775 · Cited by 3,255
Attribution theory and research
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325 · Cited by 2,651
A General Theory of Marketing Ethics
Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/027614678600600103 · Cited by 2,592
Recent Developments in Role Theory
Biddle, B. J. (1986) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435 · Cited by 2,358
Cited by
AI increases unethical consumer behavior due to reduced anticipatory guilt
Kim, T., Lee, H., Kim, M. Y., Kim, S., & Duhachek, A. (2023) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-021-00832-9 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisk, R., Grove, S., Harris, L. C., Keeffe, D. A., Daunt, K. L., Russell‐Bennett, R., & Wirtz, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Services Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-09-14
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 417-429
- ISSN
- 0887-6045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087752811
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 28.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customers behaving badly: a state of the art review, research agenda and implications for practitioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/08876041011072537
- The paper
- Fisk, R., Grove, S., Harris, L. C., Keeffe, D. A., Daunt, K. L., Russell‐Bennett, R., & Wirtz, J. (2010). Customers behaving badly: a state of the art review, research agenda and implications for practitioners. Journal of Services Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011072537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.