Cited by 200Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBullying, Victimization, and AggressionPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Punishment Insensitivity and Parenting: Temperament and Learning as Interacting Risks for Antisocial Behavior

Dadds, Mark R., Salmon, Karen·2003·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Abstract

We review ideas about individual differences in sensitivity or responsiveness to common disciplinary behaviors parents use to correct aggressive and antisocial behavior in children. At extremes, children may be seen as "punishment-insensitive," an heuristic with some value relevant to models of the development of antisocial and aggressive behavior disorders. Literature from diverse fields, such as psychopathy, child temperament, socialization and the development of moral conscience, conditioning theory, and personality theory, have all utilized the idea that humans differ in their sensitivity to aversive stimuli and the cues that signal their occurrence, as well as their ability to inhibit reward-driven behavior, in the presence of punishment cues. Contemporary thinking places these dispositions squarely as basic biological aspects of temperament that moderate the effects of the environment (e.g., parenting) on outcomes (e.g., mental health). We review a largely forgotten literature that shows clearly that sensitivity to punishment is also reliably influenced by the environment itself. An attempt is then made to model the interactional processes by which parenting and punishment sensitivities in children magnify or diminish each other's progress toward healthy or antisocial development. Implications for parenting of children with low responsiveness to punishment strategies are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023762009877

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dadds, M. R., & Salmon, K.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Dadds, Mark R.
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Published
2003-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
69-86
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
OpenAlex
W1742654942
Cited by
200
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
parenting, child temperament, antisocial behavior, aggression, punishment sensitivity, aversive stimuli, psychopathy, conditioning theory, personality theory, gene-environment interaction, parenting strategies
MeSH terms
Antisocial Personality Disorder, Child, Humans, Learning, Parent-Child Relations, Punishment, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Temperament, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review