Cited by 209Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Family conflict, autonomic nervous system functioning, and child adaptation: State of the science and future directions

Open access
El-Sheikh, Mona, Erath, Stephen A.·2011·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

The family is one of the primary contexts of child development. Marital and parent–child conflict (family conflict) are common and predict a wide range of negative behavioral and emotional outcomes in children. Thus, an important task for developmental researchers is to identify the processes through which family conflict contributes to children's psychological maladjustment, as well as vulnerability and protective factors in the context of family conflict. In the current paper, we aim to advance a conceptual model that focuses on indices of children's autonomic nervous system (ANS) functioning that increase vulnerability or provide protection against psychological maladjustment in the context of family conflict. In doing so, we provide a selective review that reflects the state of the science linking family conflict, children's ANS activity, and child psychological adjustment, and offer directions and guidance for future research. Our hope is to accelerate research at the intersection of family conflict and ANS functioning to advance understanding of risk and resilience among children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579411000034

Cites

192 of 192 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher resting parasympathetic nervous system activation and greater parasympathetic nervous system suppression to challenge should buffer against negative developmental outcomes.

    “As a whole, higher resting parasympathetic nervous system activation (i.e., keeping sympathetic control under check) and greater parasympathetic nervous system suppression to challenge (i.e., easing parasympathetic 'break' over sympathetic activation) should buffer against negative developmental outcomes (Cummings et al., 2009; El-Sheikh & Erath, 2011), ensuring adaptive neurobiological regulation”

    From A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE IMPACT OF EXPOSURE TO INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH (2014) · cites this paper as El-Sheikh & Erath, 2011

    The Literature Review (§ Interactions between family conflict and ANS functioning; page unavailable) says higher resting vagal tone and greater vagal withdrawal generally protect against child maladjustment in the context of family conflict. The claim broadens that context to negative developmental outcomes generally and implies a more assured benefit than the paper supports: Future Directions (§ Further examination of individual systems; page unavailable) cautions that excessive vagal withdrawal may impede coping. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A significant proportion of the data reviewed remains inconsistent with the sensitization model of autonomic regulations.

    “A significant proportion of the data reviewed above, however, remains inconsistent with the sensitization model of autonomic regulations (Davies et al., 2009; El-Sheikh & Hinnant, 2011; El-Sheikh et al., 2011; El-Sheikh et al., 2013; El-Sheikh et al., 2009; El-Sheikh & Whitson, 2006).”

    From A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE IMPACT OF EXPOSURE TO INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH (2014) · cites this paper as El-Sheikh et al., 2011

    The Literature Review (‘Family conflict and ANS functioning’; page unavailable) reports differing autonomic responses associated with family conflict, including weaker RSA reductions and higher skin-conductance reactivity. The Future Directions section (‘Lab stimuli’; page unavailable) also notes inconsistencies across findings. The paper does not establish that a significant proportion of the reviewed data is inconsistent with a sensitization model; that characterization is the citing authors’ interpretation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Boucsein W Electodermal activity 1992 Plenum Press New York
  2. Davies PT Cummings EM Cicchetti D Cohen DJ Interparental discord, family process, and developmental psychopathology. Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 3. Risk, disorder, and adaptation 2006 86 128 Wiley New York 2nd ed.
  3. El-Sheikh M Kouros CD Erath S Cummings EM Keller P Staton L Marital conflict and children's externalizing behavior: Interactions between parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system activity. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 2009 74 1 Serial No. 292 PMC2918238 19302676
  4. Gunnar MR Vazquez DM Cicchetti D Cohen D Stress neurobiology and developmental psychopathology. Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 2. Developmental neuroscience 2006 Wiley New York 2nd ed.
  5. McEwen BS Lasley EN The end of stress 2002 Joseph Henry Press Washington, DC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Sheikh, M., & Erath, S. A.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2011-04-18
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
703-721
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2053565107
Cited by
209
References
192
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0339115, 0623936)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station (ALA080-001)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL093246)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD046795)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
family conflict, autonomic nervous system, child adjustment, parent-child conflict, marital conflict, child vulnerability, resilience, risk factors, child development, psychophysiology
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Autonomic Nervous System, Child, Child Development, Psychology, Child, Conflict, Psychological, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Stress, Psychological, Parenting, Family Conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review