CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 557Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringTourism, Volunteerism, and DevelopmentBlood donation and transfusion practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Collective and Reflexive Styles of Volunteering: A Sociological Modernization Perspective

Open access
Hustinx, Lesley, Lammertyn, Frans·2003·Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
DOI 10.1023/a:1023948027200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper presents a theory-guided examination of the (changing) nature of volunteering through the lens of sociological modernization theories. Existing accounts of qualitative changes in motivational bases and patterns of volunteering are interpreted against the background of broader, modernization-driven social-structural transformations. It is argued that volunteer involvement should be qualified as a biographically embedded reality, and a new analytical framework of collective and reflexive styles of volunteering is constructed along the lines of the ideal- typical biographical models that are delineated by modernization theorists. Styles of volunteering are understood as essentially multidimensional, multiform, and multilevel in nature. Both structural-behavioral and motivational-attitudinal volunteering features are explored along the lines of six different dimensions: the biographical frame of reference, the motivational structure, the course and intenity of commitment, the organizational environment, the choice of (field of) activity, and the relation to paid work.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023948027200

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Beck, U. (1999). Schü one Neue Arbeitswelt. Vision: Weltbü urgergesellschaft, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt.
  2. Beck, U., and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1996). Individualization and “precarious freedoms”: Perspectives and controversies of a subject-orientated sociology. In: Helaas, P., Lash, S., and Morris, P. (eds.), Detraditionalization, Blackwell, Oxford.
  3. Beck, U., and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization, Sage, London.
  4. Beck, U., Giddens, A., and Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  5. Beher, K., Liebig, R., and Rauschenbach, T. (2000). Strukturwandel des Ehrenamtes. Gemeinwohlo-rientierung im Modernisierungsprozess, Weinheim, Müunchen.
  6. Brüomme, N., and Strasser H. (2001). Gespaltene Büurgergesellschaft? Die ungleichen Folgen des Struk-turwandels von Engagement und Participation. Polit. Zeitgesch. B25–26: 6-14.
  7. Cameron, H. (1999). Are members volunteers? An exploration of the concept of membership drawing upon studies of the local church. Volunt. Action 1: 53-65.
  8. van Daal, H. J. (1990). Vrijwilligerswerk en Informele Hulp in Nederland, NIMAWO, Gravenhage.
  9. van Daal, H. J. (1994). Hedendaags vrijwilligerswerk: Gedaanten, identiteit en aantrekkingskracht. In: Dekker, P. (ed.), Civil Society: Verkenningen van en Perspectief op Vrijwilligerswerk, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Rijswijk.
  10. Evers, A. (1999). Verschiedene Konzeptionalisierungen von Engagement. Ihre Bedeutung füur Anal-yse und Politik. In: Kistler, E., Noll, H., and Priller, E. (eds.), Perspektiven Gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalts. Empirische Befunde, Praxiserfahrungen, Messkonzepte, Sigma, Berlin.
  11. Hacket, A., and Mutz, G. (2002). Empirische Befunde zum büurgerschaftlichen Engagement. Polit. Zeitgesch. B9: 39-46.
  12. Heelas, P. (1996). Introduction: Detraditionalization and its rivals. In: Heelas, P., Lash, S., and Morris, P. (eds.), Detraditionalization, Blackwell, Cambridge.
  13. Heinze, R. G., and Olk, T. (1999). Vom Ehrenamt zum büurgerschaftlichen Engagement. Trends des begrifflichen und gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandels. In: Kistler, E., Noll, H., and Priller, E. (eds.), Perspektiven Gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalts. Empirische Befunde, Praxiserfahrungen, Messkonzepte, Sigma, Berlin.
  14. Janowicz, C., Klement, C., and Mutz, G. (2000). Corporate Volunteering–neue Formen büurgerschaftlichen Engagements in der Tüatigkeitsgesellschaft. Berl. Debatte Initial 11: 17-26.
  15. Klages, H. (1998). Engagement und Engagementpotential in Deutschland. Polit. Zeitgesch. B38: 29-38.
  16. Küuhnlein, I. (1998). Motivlagen, Sinnquellen und Identitätsrelevanz erwerbsarbeitsunabhängiger sozialer Tätigkeiten. Teil der Expertise, von R. G. Heinze & H. Keupp, Gesellschaftliche Be-deutung von Tätigkeiten ausserhalb der Erwerbsarbeit. In: Kommission für Zukunftfragen der Freistaaten Bayern und Massnahmen, Erwerbstätigkeit und Arbeitslosigkeit in Deutschland–En-twicklung, Ursachen und Massnahmen. Gutachten im Auftrag der Kommission für Zukunftsfragen. Anlageband 3, Kommission für Zukunftfragen der Freistaaten Bayern und Massnahmen, Bonn.
  17. Kühnlein, I., and Böhle, F. (2003). Motive und Motivationswandel des büurgerschaflichen Engagements. In: Enquete-Kommission “Zukunft des Büurgerschaftlichen Engagements,” Deutscher Bundestag, Bürgerschaftliches Engagement und Erwerbsarbeit, Leske + Budrich, Opladen.
  18. Kühnlein, I., and Mutz, G. (1999). Individualisierung und büurgerschaftliches Engagement in Der Tüatigkeitsgesellschaft. In: Kistler, E., Noll, H., and Priller, E. (eds.), Perspektiven Gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalts. Empirische Befunde, Praxiserfahrungen, Messkonzepte, Sigma, Berlin.
  19. Lash, S. (1994). Reflexivity and its doubles: Structure, aesthetics, community. In: Beck, U., Giddens, A., and Lash, S. (eds.), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  20. Maloney, W. A., and Jordan, G. (1997). The rise of protest business in Britain. In: van Deth, J. W. (ed.), Private Groups and Public Life: Social Participation, Voluntary Associations and Political Involvement in Representative Democracies, Routledge, London.
  21. Meijs, L. C. P. M., and Hoogstad, E. (2001). New ways of managing volunteers: Combining membership management and programme management. Volunt. Action 3: 41-61.
  22. Olk, T. (1989). Vom “alten” zum “neuen” Ehrenamt. Ehrenamtliches soziales Engagement ausserhalb etablierter Trüager. Blätter Wohlfahrtspflege 136: 7-10.
  23. Olk, T. (1990). Füorderung und Unterstüutzung freiwilliger socialer Tüatigkeiten–Eine neue Aufgabe füur den Socialstaat. In: Heinze, R., and Offe, C. (eds.), Formen der Eigenarbeit, Leske + Budrich, Opladen.
  24. Rommel, W., Opdebeeck, S., Lammertyn, F., and Bouverne-De Bie, M. (1997). Vrijwillige Inzet in Vlaanderen. Een Exploratie, LUCAS, Leuven.
  25. Thompson, J. B. (1996). Tradition and self in a mediated world. In: Heelas, P., Lash, S., and Morris, P. (eds.), Detraditionalization, Blackwell, Cambridge.
  26. Voyé, L. (1995). Pour revisiter le báenáevolat. Propos háetáerodoxes. Swiss Sociol. Rev. 21: 317-340.
  27. Wuthnow, R. (1996). Poor Richard's Principle: Rediscovering the American Dream through the Moral Dimension of Work, Business, and Money, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 557

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hustinx, L., & Lammertyn, F.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Hustinx, Lesley
ORCID
Hustinx, Lesley
Venue
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2003-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
167-187
ISSN
  • 0957-8765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7888
DOI
10.1023/a:1023948027200
OpenAlex
W72049270
Cited by
553
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 25
FWCI
19.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood donation and transfusion practices
Keywords
volunteering, volunteer motivation, volunteer commitment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review