Cited by 541Data Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

Tree Induction for Probability-Based Ranking

Open access
Provost, Foster, Domingos, Pedro·2003·Machine Learning

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024099825458

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The time complexity for computing the AUC is with respect to the Hand and Till AUC model and according to Provost and Domingo's AUC model.

    “In addition, the time complexity for computing the AUC is with respect to the Hand and Till AUC model [341] and according to Provost and Domingo’s AUC model [336].”

    From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [336]

    Section 7.1 (page unavailable) describes the paper’s expected-AUC calculation for multiclass data, supporting the reference to a Provost–Domingos AUC approach. It does not give the time complexity of computing AUC, so the complexity part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AUC is utilized to conduct comparisons between learning algorithms and to construct an optimal learning model.

    “It is utilized to conduct comparisons between learning algorithms [336–338], as well as to construct an optimal learning model [339, 340].”

    From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [336]

    Section 6, “Comparing PETs” (page unavailable), says AUC is used to compare probability-based rankings produced by different classifiers. The paper does not say AUC is used to construct an optimal learning model; its reported AUC results evaluate models rather than describe a model-construction procedure. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Buntine, W. (1991). A theory of learning classification rules. Ph.D. thesis, School of Computer Science, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
  2. Domingos, P. (1999). MetaCost: A general method for making classifiers cost-sensitive. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 155-164). New York: ACM Press.
  3. Domingos, P. (1997). Knowledge acquisition from examples via multiple models. In D. H. Fisher (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-97) (pp. 98-106). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  4. Perlich, C., Provost, F., & Simonoff, J. S. (2003). Tree induction versus logistic regression: A learning-curve analysis. Journal of Machine Learning Research. (In press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Provost, F., & Domingos, P.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Machine Learning
Published
2003-09
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
199-215
ISSN
  • 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0565
OpenAlex
W1509515766
Cited by
541
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 39
FWCI
81.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
  • Faculty Digital Archive (New York University Florence) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CAREER)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
class membership probabilities, decision tree induction, Laplace smoothing, bagging, tree size, classification accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review