Cited by 54Health, psychology, and well-beingCardiac Health and Mental HealthWorkplace Health and Well-being

The sense of coherence, occupation and all-cause mortality in the Helsinki Heart Study

Poppius, E., Tenkanen, L., Hakama, M., Kalimo, R., Pitkänen, T.·2003·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that people with a strong sense of coherence (SOC) have decreased all-cause mortality.Methods The effect of occupation and the SOC on all-cause mortality was studied among 4405 Finnish middle-aged employed men in a prospective 8-year follow-up study.Results Using Cox proportional hazards models the crude relative risk for all-cause mortality for the low SOC tertile when compared to the high SOC tertile was 1.23 (95% CI: 0.90-1.68). Adjusting for age, smoking, alcohol and occupation increased the risk slightly to 1.35. Occupation was an effect modifier, since among white-collar workers the corresponding relative risk of the low SOC tertile was 2.27 (95% CI: 1.12-4.59, p = 0.02) and among blue-collar workers the relative risk for all-cause mortality was stable (1.33-1.52) in each SOC tertile. The classic risk factors, smoking and alcohol, showed higher relative risks than the SOC.Conclusions The effect of the health-promoting qualities of the SOC upon all-cause mortality was significant among white-collar workers, but not among blue-collar workers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024213427147

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poppius, E., Tenkanen, L., Hakama, M., Kalimo, R., & Pitkänen, T.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2003-05
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
389-393
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W2030679138
Cited by
54
References
17
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Työsuojelurahasto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
sense of coherence, all-cause mortality, occupation, white-collar workers, blue-collar workers, effect modification, middle-aged men, smoking, alcohol consumption, cardiovascular risk factors, Helsinki Heart Study
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Hypolipidemic Agents, Coronary Disease, Finland, Holistic Health, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Occupations, Primary Prevention, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Smoking, Gemfibrozil, Proportional Hazards Models, Occupational Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review