Cited by 261Behavioral and Psychological StudiesEducation Discipline and InequalityEarly Childhood Education and Development

Evaluation of a Targeted Intervention Within a Schoolwide System of Behavior Support

Hawken, Leanne S., Horner, Robert H.·2003·Journal of Behavioral Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025512411930

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawken, L. S., & Horner, R. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Hawken, Leanne S.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Education
Published
2003-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
225-240
ISSN
  • 1053-0819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3513
OpenAlex
W203373993
Cited by
261
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Behavioral Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
targeted interventions, school-based behavior support, academic engagement, multiple baseline design, intervention effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review