CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 380Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Supplementary Norms for Individuals with Autism

Carter, Alice S., Volkmar, Fred R., Sparrow, Sara S., Wang, Jing-Jen, Lord, Catherine, Dawson, Geraldine, Fombonne, Eric, Loveland, Katherine, Mesibov, Gary, Schopler, Eric·1998·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
DOI 10.1023/a:1026056518470
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales Special Population norms are presented for four groups of individuals with autism: (a) mute children under 10 years of age; (b) children with at least some verbal skills under 10 years of age; (c) mute individuals who are 10 years of age or older; and (d) individuals with at least some verbal skills who are 10 years of age or older. The sample included 684 autistic individuals ascertained from cases referred for the DSM-IV autism/PDD field trial collaborative study and five university sites with expertise in autism. Young children had higher standard scores than older individuals across all Vineland domains. In the Communication domain, younger verbal children were least impaired, older mute individuals most impaired, and younger mute and older verbal individuals in the midrange. Verbal individuals achieved higher scores in Daily Living Skills than mute individuals. The expected profile of a relative weakness in Socialization and relative strength in Daily Living Skills was obtained with age-equivalent but not standard scores. Results high-light the importance of employing Vineland special population norms as well as national norms when evaluating individuals with autism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026056518470

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Adams, G. (1984). Comprehensive test of adaptive behavior. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
  2. Hill, I. D. (1976). Normal-Johnson and Johnson-normal transformations. Applied Statistics, 45, 183–190.
  3. Klin, A., Carter, A. S., & Sparrow, S. S. (1997). Psychological assessment of children with autism. In D. J. Cohen & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (2nd ed., pp. 418–427). New York: Wiley.
  4. Lord, C. (1993). Complexity of social behavior in autism. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 292–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Roid, G. H. (1989). Programs to fit skewed distributions and generate percentile norms for skewed or kurtotic distributions: Continuous norming with the first four moments. (Technical Report No. 89–02). Salem, OR: Assessment Research.
  6. Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1988). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  7. Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D., & Cicchetti, D. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  8. Volkmar, F. R., & Cohen, D. J. (1988). Issues in the diagnosis and classification of infantile autism. In B. Lahey & A. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
  9. World Health Organization. (1990). International Classification of Diseases (draft version: Diagnostic criteria for research) (10th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–380 of 380

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Carter, A. S., Volkmar, F. R., Sparrow, S. S., Wang, J.-J., Lord, C., Dawson, G., Fombonne, E., Loveland, K., Mesibov, G., & Schopler, E.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1998-08
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
287-302
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
DOI
10.1023/a:1026056518470
OpenAlex
W1605138144
Cited by
367
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, autism spectrum disorder, adaptive behavior, verbal ability, age differences, communication, daily living skills, socialization, Z-score
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Communication Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Mutism, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Sampling Studies, Social Behavior, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review