Cited by 263Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distinguishing Dimensions of Anxiety and Depression

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026485530405

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Andrews, G. (1996). Comorbidity in neurotic disorders: The similarities are more important than the differences. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford Press.
  2. Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford Press.
  3. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Manual for the Revised Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  4. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1990). Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  5. Brown, T. A., & Chorpita, B. F. (1996). Reply to Andrews. On the validity and comorbidity of the DSM-III-R and DSM-IV anxiety disorders. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 48–52). New York: Guilford Press.
  6. Nitschke, J. B., Heller, W., & Miller, G. A. (1998, May). Psychometric differentiation of affective dimensions: Implications for the tripartite model. In S. J. Catanzaro (Chair), The tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Current research and future prospects. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, Illinois
  7. Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1965). Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List. San Diego, CA: EdITS.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 261

Metadata

Authors
Nitschke, J. B., Heller, W., Imig, J. C., McDonald, R. P., & Miller, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
  • Heller, Wendy
  • Miller, Gregory A.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2001-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W76320215
Cited by
263
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
anxiety, depression, anxious arousal, somatic anxiety, anxious apprehension, worry, negative affect, affective domain, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review