Cited by 35Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and InterventionsWorkplace Health and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Prevention of Substance Abuse Among Construction Workers: A Field Test of a Social-Cognitive Program

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jopp.0000048025.11036.32

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  2. Bennett, J. B., & Lehman, W. E. K. (Ed.). (2002). Beyond drug testing: Innovative approaches to dealing with employee substance abuse. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  3. Cook, R. F., Hersch, R. K., & McPherson, T. L. (1999). Drug assessment methods for the workplace. In T. Miezkowski (Ed.), Drug testing methods: Assessment and evaluation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  4. Cook, R. F., Back, A. S., Trudeau, J. V., & McPherson, T. L. (2002). Integrating substance abuse pre-vention into health promotion programs in the workplace. In J. Bennett & W. Lehman (Eds.), Preventing workplace substance abuse: Beyond drug testing to wellness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  5. Hersch, R. K. (1997). Substance use behavior risk and protective factors among sixth and tenth graders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
  6. SAMHSA. (1999). Summary of findings from the 1998 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies.
  7. Turner, C. F., Lessler, J. T., & Gfroerer, J. C. (1992). Future directions for research and practice. In C. F. Turner, J. T. Lessler, & J. C. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey measurement of drug use: Methodological studies. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cook, R. F., Hersch, R. K., Back, A. S., & McPherson, T. L.
Affiliations
ISA Associate (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Royer F.
Venue
Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2004-11
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
337-357
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W2026859866
Cited by
35
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
substance use prevention, construction workers, health promotion, smoking, alcohol consumption, illicit drug use, stages of change, occupational health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review