Cited by 751Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchIndigenous Cultures and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conceptualizing and Measuring Historical Trauma Among American Indian People

Whitbeck, Les B., Adams, Gary W., Hoyt, Dan R., Chen, Xiaojin·2004·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

This article reports on the development of two measures relating to historical trauma among American Indian people: The Historical Loss Scale and The Historical Loss Associated Symptoms Scale. Measurement characteristics including frequencies, internal reliability, and confirmatory factor analyses were calculated based on 143 American Indian adult parents of children aged 10 through 12 years who are part of an ongoing longitudinal study of American Indian families in the upper Midwest. Results indicate both scales have high internal reliability. Frequencies indicate that the current generation of American Indian adults have frequent thoughts pertaining to historical losses and that they associate these losses with negative feelings. Two factors of the Historical Loss Associated Symptoms Scale indicate one anxiety/depression component and one anger/avoidance component. The results are discussed in terms of future research and theory pertaining to historical trauma among American Indian people.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:ajcp.0000027000.77357.31

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Alexsandrowicz D., 1973, The child and his family, 385
  2. Chodoff P., 1969, Depression and guilt among concentration camp survivors, Existential Psychiatry, 7, 19
  3. Holmes A., 1988, The grieving Indian.
  4. Kestenberg J., 1980, Generations of Holocaust, 137
  5. Klein H., 1973, The child and his family, 67
  6. Muthen L. K., 1998, Mplus User's Guide.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–751 of 751

Metadata

Authors
Whitbeck, L. B., Adams, G. W., Hoyt, D. R., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Whitbeck, Les B.
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
33
Issue
3-4
Pages
119-130
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W2073009850
Cited by
751
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 35
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 13580, R01DA013580)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
historical trauma, American Indian peoples, scale development, historical loss, anxiety and depression, Native American families
MeSH terms
Aged, Culture, Humans, Indians, North American, Life Change Events, Social Identification, Midwestern United States, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review