Cited by 18Fish Ecology and Management StudiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMarine Ecology and Invasive Species

Convergence of Differentially Invaded Systems toward Invader-dominance: Time-lagged Invasions as a Predictor in Desert Fish Communities

Unmack, Peter J., Fagan, William F.·2004·Biological Invasions

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:binv.0000022142.77046.4f

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Unmack, P. J., & Fagan, W. F.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Fagan, William F.
Venue
Biological Invasions
Published
2004-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
233-243
ISSN
  • 1387-3547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1464
OpenAlex
W2020059865
Cited by
18
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Invasions (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
Keywords
invasion dynamics, species richness, piscivorous fish, parental care, life-history traits, native fish decline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review