Cited by 419Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchSocial Robot Interaction and HRIIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Development and evaluation of a computer-animated tutor for vocabulary and language learning in children with autism

Bosseler, Alexis, Massaro, Dominic W.·2003·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Using our theoretical framework of multimodal processing, we developed and evaluated a computer-animated tutor, Baldi, to teach vocabulary and grammar for children with autism. Baldi was implemented in a Language Wizard/Player, which allows easy creation and presentation of a language lesson involving the association of pictures and spoken words. The lesson plan includes both the identification of pictures and the production of spoken words. In Experiment 1, eight children were given initial assessment tests, tutorials, and reassessment tests 30 days following mastery of the vocabulary items. All of the students learned a significant number of new words and grammar. A second within-subject design with six children followed a multiple baseline design and documented that the program was responsible for the learning and generalization of new words. The research indicates that children with autism are capable of learning new language within an automated program centered around a computer-animated agent, multimedia, and active participation and can transfer and use the language in a natural, untrained environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jadd.0000006002.82367.4f

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on the extent to which individuals on the Autism Spectrum have a deficit in language ability is mixed, but findings generally point to a deficit.

    “Research regarding the extent to which individuals on the Autism Spectrum have a deficit in their ability to perceive emotions in the face (cf. Harms et al., 2010) and a deficit in language ability (cf. Bosseler and Massaro, 2003) is mixed, however findings generally point to a deficit in both.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosseler, A., & Massaro, D. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Bosseler, Alexis
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2003-12
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
653-672
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1981710139
Cited by
419
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 28
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC000236, R01 DC 00236)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, vocabulary acquisition, grammar instruction, multimodal processing, picture-word association, language learning, children
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Teaching, Verbal Learning, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review