The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychometric Evaluation of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) in Chronic Pain Patients
Abstract
This study examined psychometric properties of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), a measure of pain-related fear. A recently developed shortened version of the PASS, the PASS-20, was also investigated. Previously reported factor structures of the PASS were tested by means of confirmatory factor analysis. Results indicated that all models fitted adequately but that a five-factor solution fitted slightly better compared to the other models tested. The four-factor solution of the PASS-20 was tested by means of confirmatory factor analysis and results indicated adequate fit. Moreover, the four-factor solution of the PASS-20 was invariant among fibromyalgia and low-back pain patients. Convergent validity of the original PASS and the PASS-20 was good and internal consistency reliability adequate to excellent. The suitability of the original PASS and the PASS-20 are discussed and directions for future research are provided.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The PASS-20 is a valid and reliable measure of anxiety symptoms in pain populations with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ¼ 0.81) and an excellent correlation between the short and long form (r ¼ 0.97) [36].”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain: Does Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Influence Treatment Outcomes? (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“The PASS has demonstrated a stable factor structure and good psychometric properties (McCracken & Dhingra, 2002; Roelofs et al., 2004), as well as strong correlations with the original 40-item PASS (McCracken, Zayfert, & Gross, 1992).”
From Acceptance and values-based action in chronic pain: A three-year follow-up analysis of treatment effectiveness and process (2011) · cites this paper as Roelofs et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“The scores from the PASS have demonstrated reliability and validity in a number of studies.”
From A Contextual Analysis of Attention to Chronic Pain: What the Patient Does With Their Pain Might Be More Important Than Their Awareness or Vigilance Alone (2007) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“The instrument is a valid and reliable measure of anxiety symptoms in pain populations.35,48”
From Telehealth Versus In-Person Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. (2017) · cites this paper as Roelofs et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“The PASS has excellent psychometric properties and measurement characteristics that compare favorably to the long form of the measure.31,49”
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
Melzack, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · Cited by 6,873
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00242-0 · Cited by 4,931
Self-citationThe Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001 · Cited by 4,619
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 · Cited by 3,270
Waddell, G., Newton, M., Henderson, I., Somerville, D., & Main, C. J. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-b · Cited by 3,167
Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Kole-Snijders, A. M. J., Boeren, R. G. B., & van Eek, H. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00279-n · Cited by 2,446
Self-citationOutline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception--I.
Lethem, J., Slade, P. D., Troup, J. D. G., & Bentley, G. (1983) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(83)90009-8 · Cited by 1,327
The pain anxiety symptoms scale: development and validation of a scale to measure fear of pain
McCracken, L. M., Zayfert, C., & Gross, R. T. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90113-p · Cited by 950
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom D. (1999).LISREL 8.30, Scientific Software International, Chicago.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wetherell, J. L., Afari, N., Rutledge, T., Sorrell, J. T., Stoddard, J. A., Petkus, A. J., Solomon, B. C., Lehman, D. H., Liu, L., Lang, A. J., et al. (2011) · PAIN · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.05.016 · Cited by 508
Acceptance and Values-Based Action in Chronic Pain: A Study of Treatment Effectiveness and Process
Vowles, K. E., & McCracken, L. M. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.3.397 · Cited by 500
Self-citationAttentional bias to pain-related information: a meta-analysis.
Crombez, G., Van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Eccleston, C., & Van Damme, S. (2013) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.013 · Cited by 334
Self-citationMcCracken, L. M., Gauntlett-Gilbert, J., & Vowles, K. E. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.013 · Cited by 290
Self-citationThe role of values in a contextual cognitive-behavioral approach to chronic pain
McCracken, L. M., & Yang, S.-Y. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.021 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Roelofs, J., McCracken, L., Peters, M. L., Crombez, G., van Breukelen, G., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (GB)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Roelofs, Jeffrey
- Venue
- Journal of Behavioral Medicine
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-183
- ISSN
- 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3521
- OpenAlex
- W2003317117
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- fear of pain, chronic pain, psychometric properties, factor structure, fibromyalgia, low back pain, convergent validity, internal consistency, measurement invariance
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
