Cited by 18Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Longitudinal Meta-analysis

Open access
Maas, Cora J. M., Hox, Joop J., Lensvelt-Mulders, Gerty J. L. M.·2004·Quality and Quantity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:ququ.0000043125.43736.c4

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maas, C. J. M., Hox, J. J., & Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L. M.
Corresponding author
Maas, Cora J. M.
Venue
Quality and Quantity
Published
2004-08
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
381-389
ISSN
  • 0033-5177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7845
OpenAlex
W2120757683
Cited by
18
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Quality & Quantity (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
multilevel analysis, infant cognitive development, preterm birth, repeated measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review