Cited by 73Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and careWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship with God and the Quality of Life of Prostate Cancer Survivors

Gall, Terry Lynn·2004·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

This study explored the role of relationship with God with respect to the quality of life of men with prostate cancer. Thirty-four men with prostate cancer completed questionnaires on demographic and illness factors, aspects of relationship with God (e.g., God image), nonreligious resources (e.g., optimism) and physical, social and emotion functioning. Results showed that relationship with God was a significant factor in the prediction of role, emotional and social functioning for these men after controlling for age, reported severity of treatment reactions and nonreligious resources. Notably, different aspects of relationship with God (e.g., causal attribution) evidenced different associations with functioning and the nonreligious resource of perceived health control. Such results suggest that relationship with God may function in a complex manner as a resource in coping with prostate cancer. Longitudinal research is needed to clarify the role of religious/spiritual resources in the short- and long-term quality of life of men with prostate cancer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:qure.0000040789.49691.59

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Khouzam HR. Prayer and the treatment of depression in a case of prostate cancer. Clin Gerontol 1996;17(1):69–73.
  2. Brady MJ, Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Mo M, Cella D. A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in Oncology. Psycho-Oncology 1999;8:417–428. · DOI
  3. Feher S, Maly RC. Coping with breast cancer in later life: The role of religious faith. Psycho-Oncology 1999;8:408–416. · DOI
  4. Taylor EJ, Outlaw FH, Bernardo TR, Roy A. Spiritual conflicts associated with praying about cancer. PsychoOncology 1999;8:386–394. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 73

Metadata

Authors
Gall, T. L.
Affiliations
Saint Paul University (CA)
Corresponding author
Gall, Terry Lynn
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2004-10
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1357-1368
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2037586387
Cited by
73
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
relationship with God, prostate cancer survivors, quality of life, spirituality, religious coping, image of God, causal attribution, optimism, social functioning, emotional functioning, role functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Canada, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research, Survivors, Sickness Impact Profile, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review