Cited by 216Cybernetics and Technology in SocietyPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeurology and Historical Studies

The First Computational Theory of Mind and Brain: A Close Look at Mcculloch and Pitts's “Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity”

Piccinini, Gualtiero·2004·Synthese

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:synt.0000043018.52445.3e

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Employing polarized, threshold-like elements in line with McCulloch-Pitts logic may facilitate the early development of multilayer processing structures, including interneurons, re-entrant closed loops and memory circuits capable of learning.

    “This approach may facilitate the early development of multilayer processing structures, including interneurons as a crucial innovation, re-entrant closed loops and memory circuits capable of learning [274,275].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [275]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piccinini, G.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Piccinini, Gualtiero
Venue
Synthese
Published
2004-08
Volume
141
Issue
2
Pages
175-215
ISSN
  • 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0964
OpenAlex
W2046606639
Cited by
215
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
19.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Synthese (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
Keywords
computational theory of mind, mind-body problem, artificial neural networks, finite automata, digital circuit design, history of artificial intelligence, history of neuroscience, history of computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review