CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 91Psychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IIP-32: Entwicklung, Validierung und Normierung einer Kurzform des Inventars zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme

Thomas, Andrea, Brähler, Elmar, Strauß, Bernhard·2011·Diagnostica
DOI 10.1026/0012-1924/a000034
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Zusammenfassung. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird die Entwicklung, Validierung und Normierung der Kurzform des Inventars zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme (IIP-32) dargestellt. Anhand einer per Zufall gezogenen Teilstichprobe (N = 996) einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe wurden entlang der 8 Skalen des IIP 32 Items nach ihren psychometrischen Eigenschaften und Circumplexkriterien ausgewählt. Zwei nicht klinische (N 1 = 1000, N 2 = 1054) sowie zwei klinische Stichproben (N klin1 = 245, N klin2 = 305) dienten der Überprüfung der psychometrischen und circumplexbezogenen Item- und Skalenparameter sowie der konfirmatorischen Prüfung des Instruments. Zudem wurde das IIP-32 im Rahmen einer bevölkerungsrepräsentativen Befragung an 2115 Personen im Alter von 14 bis 98 Jahren bundesweit normiert. Die Kurzform erweist sich als ein der Langform weitgehend vergleichbares Instrument und empfiehlt sich sowohl für den Einsatz in klinischen als auch in nicht klinischen Studien.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1026/0012-1924/a000034

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ms. Lux's interpersonal styles assessed with the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-32 showed a strong tendency towards the submissive, distant side of the circumplex model, resulting in social avoidance and submissive behaviour.

    “Ms. Lux's interpersonal styles were assessed with the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems -32 (IIP-32; Barkham et al., 1996;Thomas et al., 2011) 3 and showed a strong tendency towards the submissive, distant side of the circumplex model, resulting in social avoidance and submissive behaviour (Figure 1b).”

    From Data-Informed Case Formulation with the Trier Treatment Navigator (2022) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2011

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1207/S15327752JPA7903_04 · DOI
  2. 10.1207/s15327752jpa5503&4_10 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01159.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1026/1616-3443.34.3.205 · DOI
  5. 10.1026/0012-1924.53.2.83 · DOI
  6. Brähler E., 1999, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und medizinische Psychologie, 49, 422
  7. 10.1037/a0016515 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/10261-011 · DOI
  9. 10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.98 · DOI
  10. 10.1207/S15327752JPA7402_9 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0146167291176010 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.105 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb01033.x · DOI
  14. Gurtman M. B., 1994, Differentiating normal and abnormal personality, 243
  15. 10.1027//1015-5759.15.3.233 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/0471264385.wei0216 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/10503300802192158 · DOI
  18. 10.1055/s-2004-819806 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/10727-000 · DOI
  20. Horowitz L. M., 2000, Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme (IIP-D). Handanweisung (2. Aufl.)
  21. 10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.172 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/cpp.466 · DOI
  23. 10.1026/0012-1924.51.3.145 · DOI
  24. Kiesler D. J., 1996, Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology and psychotherapy
  25. 10.1026/0084-5345.31.1.40 · DOI
  26. Leary T. F., 1957, Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation
  27. 10.1026/0012-1924.52.1.11 · DOI
  28. 10.13109/zptm.2009.55.2.162 · DOI
  29. Rounds, J. Tracy, T. J. Hubert, L. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypothesis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239–259. · DOI
  30. 10.1207/s15327752jpa8303_05 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/1073191195002001006 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Strauß B., 2006, Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 42, 207
  33. 10.1037/10232-000 · DOI
  34. Sullivan H. S., 1953, The interpersonal theory of psychiatry
  35. Thomas A., 2008, Klinische Diagnostik und Evaluation, 1, 255
  36. 10.1177/0013164497057001012 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/1040-3590.15.1.29 · DOI
  38. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, A., Brähler, E., & Strauß, B.
Affiliations
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Diagnostica
Publisher
Hogrefe Publishing Group
Published
2011-04
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
68-83
ISSN
  • 0012-1924 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-622X
DOI
10.1026/0012-1924/a000034
OpenAlex
W2141011369
Cited by
91
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Diagnostica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
short form, interpersonal problems, psychometric validation, reference values, circumplex model, scale development, confirmatory factor analysis, clinical and non-clinical samples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review