Klinisches Untersuchungsverfahren
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All CSS subscales showed moderate to strong intercorrelations, except for the mistrust factor, where only small or nonexistent associations were observed.
“As detailed in Multimedia Appendix 4 [16-19,26,40,41] all CSS subscales showed moderate to strong intercorrelations, except for the mistrust factor, where only small or nonexistent associations were observed.”
From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [41]
Individuals with high HA (Illness Attitude Scale≥47) considered dysfunctional behavior (e.g., physician hopping and ordering nonprescribed medication on the web) to be more likely because of health-related internet use.
“Furthermore, individuals with high HA (Illness Attitude Scale≥47 [41]) considered dysfunctional behavior (eg, physician hopping and ordering nonprescribed medication on the web) to be more likely because of health-related internet use [36].”
From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [41]
Cites
Untitled work
H.-U., W. (2002) · Psychotherapeutenjournal
Unresolved
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 1 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schenkel, S. K., Jungmann, S. M., Gropalis, M., & Witthöft, M. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/27835 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Eichenberg, C., & Schott, M. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10980 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gmelch, M., & Reinecker, H.
- Affiliations
- Bamberg
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-70
- ISSN
- 1616-3443 (ISSN-L)
- 2190-6297
- OpenAlex
- W4254105686
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- clinical evaluation, psychological assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
