Cited by 48Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Use of web-based health services in individuals with and without symptoms of hypochondria: survey study

Open access
Eichenberg, Christiane, Schott, Markus·2019·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of people consult physicians because of distressing information found online. Cyberchondria refers to the phenomenon of health anxiety because of online health information. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine online health research of individuals with and without symptoms of hypochondria and their impact on health anxiety as well as behavior. METHODS: An online survey was conducted. Demographic data, health-related internet use, and general health behavior were assessed. The illness attitude scale was used to record symptoms of hypochondria. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of N=471 participants. More than 40% (188/471) of participants showed at least some symptoms of hypochondria. Participants with symptoms of hypochondria used the internet more frequently for health-related purposes and also frequented more online services than individuals without symptoms. Most online health services were rated as more reliable by individuals with symptoms of hypochondria. Changes to behavior such as doctor hopping or ordering nonprescribed medicine online were considered more likely by individuals with symptoms of hypochondria. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that individuals with symptoms of hypochondria do not turn to online research as a result of lacking alternatives but rather consult health services on- as well as offline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/10980

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a single study of undergraduate students, pain catastrophizing was a unique cognitive and emotional factor that independently, accounting for health anxiety and negative affect, contributes to escalations in health-related distress that results from online health searches.

    “The association with CYB has been investigated in a single study of undergraduate students [54], resulting that pain catastrophizing is a unique cognitive and emotional factor that independently (accounting for health anxiety and negative affect) contributes to escalations in health-related distress that results from online health searches.”

    From Is cyberchondria a new transdiagnostic digital compulsive syndrome? A systematic review of the evidence (2020) · cites this paper as [54]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Current and partly inhomogeneous results raise doubts about factors that amplify anxiety during health-related internet use.

    “However, current and partly inhomogeneous results raise doubts in this context [13,34,36].”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Discussion’s Limitations and Future Research section says further study is needed to clarify how personality traits, online content, and cognitive and emotional processes moderate the relationship between internet use and health anxiety. The Principal Findings section also says few detailed studies exist. These passages support uncertainty about the relevant factors, but they do not characterize the existing results as partly inhomogeneous. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals with high HA (Illness Attitude Scale≥47) considered dysfunctional behavior (e.g., physician hopping and ordering nonprescribed medication on the web) to be more likely because of health-related internet use.

    “Furthermore, individuals with high HA (Illness Attitude Scale≥47 [41]) considered dysfunctional behavior (eg, physician hopping and ordering nonprescribed medication on the web) to be more likely because of health-related internet use [36].”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Abstract Results and Results > Health Behavior say participants with symptoms of hypochondria considered doctor hopping and ordering medication online more likely after using online health services. Methods > Material gives an Illness Attitude Scale cutoff of 47, but Results > Sample says the behavioral comparison merged participants with some symptoms and those who could be diagnosed with hypochondria; it does not report this finding specifically for participants scoring ≥47. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The type of web-based service used seems to have an impact: using forums that provide web-based contact with experts or the possibility of sharing with other affected persons seems to alleviate anxiety, whereas using diagnosis systems and video platforms seems to have the opposite effect.

    “Furthermore, the type of web-based service used seems to have an impact: using forums that provide web-based contact with experts or the possibility of sharing with other affected persons seems to alleviate anxiety, whereas using diagnosis systems and video platforms seems to have the opposite effect [36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eichenberg, C., & Schott, M.
Affiliations
Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT)
Corresponding author
Schott, Markus
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2019-06-10
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
e10980
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2942328857
Cited by
48
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
cyberchondria, health anxiety, online health information, web-based health services, internet use for health, health behavior, attitudes toward illness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review