Ecological Behavior, Environmental Attitude, and Feelings of Responsibility for the Environment

Abstract

Given their definition of subjective norms, rational-choice theories must be located within the realm of social conventionality. However, subjective norms can be grounded in moral as well as conventional considerations. Not surprisingly, then, rational-choice theories insufficiently explain behaviors that are at least partially moral, such as ecological behavior. The present paper establishes an expanded rational-choice model of environmental attitude that extends into the moral domain by using feelings of personal obligation toward the environment (i. e., feelings of responsibility) as an additional predictor of intentions to behave ecologically. Findings from two studies are presented. In Study 1 a sample of Swiss adults (N = 436) was used to test the proposed model. Study 2 replicates the findings of Study 1 with a sample of California college students (N = 488). Assessments were carried out in a structural equation modeling framework. Environmental knowledge, environmental values, and responsibility feelings together explained 45% (50% in Study 2) of the variance of ecological behavior intention which, in turn, predicted 76% (94%) of the explainable variance of general ecological behavior. As the inclusion of responsibility feelings increased the proportion of explained variance of ecological behavior intention by 5% (10%) above and beyond a more basic attitude model, the moral extension of the proposed attitude model is largely supported.

Cites (6)

1. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
   Ajzen, Icek · 1985 · Action Control
2. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
   Crowne, Douglas P., Marlowe, David · 1960 · Journal of Consulting Psychology
3. Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
   Hines, Jody M., Hungerford, Harold R., Tomera, Audrey N. · 1987 · The Journal of Environmental Education
4. The “new environmental paradigm”
   Dunlap, Riley E., Van Liere, Kent D. · 1978 · The Journal of Environmental Education
5. Value orientations, gender and environmental concern
   Stern, Paul C., Dietz, Thomas, Kalof, Linda · 1993 · Environment and Behavior
6. Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling
   Guagnano, Gregory A., Stern, Paul C., Dietz, Thomas · 1995 · Environment and Behavior

Show all 6 references

Cited by (12)

1. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour
   Bamberg, Sebastian, Möser, Guido · 2007 · Journal of Environmental Psychology
2. Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts.
   Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Simons, Joke, Lens, Willy, Sheldon, Kennon M., Deci, Edward L. · 2004 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies
   Geels, Frank W. · 2012 · Journal of Transport Geography
4. New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ofPerspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues
   Schultz, P. Wesley · 2000 · Journal of Social Issues
5. Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample
   Frick, Jacqueline, Kaiser, Florian G., Wilson, Mark · 2004 · Personality and Individual Differences

See all 415