Cited by 69Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Cultural context is crucial in suicide research and prevention

Hjelmeland, Heidi·2011·Crisis

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0227-5910/a000097

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hjelmeland, H.
Affiliations
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Hjelmeland, Heidi
Venue
Crisis
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
61-64
ISSN
  • 0227-5910 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2396
OpenAlex
W2155559695
Cited by
69
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Crisis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
suicide, suicide prevention, cultural context, cultural factors in suicide, cross-cultural research
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Brain, Cooperative Behavior, Cultural Characteristics, Humans, Middle Aged, Research, Risk Factors, Social Values, Suicide, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Intention, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review