The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of School-Based Interventions Aimed at Preventing, Treating, and Responding to Suicide- Related Behavior in Young People
Abstract
Background: Suicide, in particular among young people, is a major public health problem, although little is known regarding effective interventions for managing and preventing suicide-related behavior. Aims: To review the empirical literature pertaining to suicide postvention, prevention, and early intervention, specifically in school settings. Method: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT) as well as citation lists of relevant articles using terms related to suicide and schools were searched in July 2011. School-based programs targeting suicide, attempted suicide, suicidal ideation, and self-harm where intent is not specified were included. No exclusion was placed on trial design. All studies had to include a suicide-related outcome. Results: A total of 412 potentially relevant studies were identified, 43 of which met the inclusion criteria, as well as three secondary publications: 15 universal awareness programs, 23 selective interventions, 3 targeted interventions, and 2 postvention trials. Limitations: Overall, the evidence was limited and hampered by methodological concerns, particularly a lack of RCTs. Conclusions: The most promising interventions for schools appear to be gatekeeper training and screening programs. However, more research is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., Cha, C. B., Kessler, R. C., & Lee, S. (2008) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxn002 · Cited by 2,897
Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm: Systematic review
Owens, D., Horrocks, J., & House, A. (2002) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.181.3.193 · Cited by 1,241
Deliberate self harm in adolescents: self report survey in schools in England
Hawton, K., Rodham, K., Evans, E., & Weatherall, R. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7374.1207 · Cited by 1,008
Silverman, M. M., Berman, A. L., Sanddal, N. D., O'Carroll, P. W., & Joiner, T. E. (2007) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.264 · Cited by 991
Silverman, M. M., Berman, A. L., Sanddal, N. D., O'Carroll, P. W., & Joiner, T. E. (2007) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.248 · Cited by 593
An Outcome Evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program
Aseltine, R. H., & DeMartino, R. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.446 · Cited by 463
Evaluating the SOSsuicide prevention program: a replication and extension
Aseltine, R. H., James, A., Schilling, E. A., & Glanovsky, J. (2007) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-161 · Cited by 348
The Impact of Suicide on the Family
Cerel, J., Jordan, J. R., & Duberstein, P. R. (2008) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910.29.1.38 · Cited by 315
Adrian, M., Zeman, J., Erdley, C., Lisa, L., & Sim, L. (2011) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9465-3 · Cited by 301
An Evaluation of a School‐Based Suicide Awareness Intervention
Kalafat, J., & Elias, M. (1994) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.1994.tb00747.x · Cited by 160
Cited by
Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing
Patton, G. C., Sawyer, S. M., Santelli, J. S., Ross, D. A., Afifi, R., Allen, N. B., Arora, M., Azzopardi, P., Baldwin, W., Bonell, C., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00579-1 · Cited by 3,785
Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review
Zalsman, G., Hawton, K., Wasserman, D., van Heeringen, K., Arensman, E., Sarchiapone, M., Carli, V., Höschl, C., Barzilay, R., Balazs, J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30030-x · Cited by 1,765
Social media and suicide prevention: a systematic review
Robinson, J., Cox, G., Bailey, E., Hetrick, S., Rodrigues, M., Fisher, S., & Herrman, H. (2016) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/eip.12229 · Cited by 336
Self-citationEvidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors in Youth
Glenn, C. R., Franklin, J. C., & Nock, M. K. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2014.945211 · Cited by 288
“…these studies from our review: prevention programs generally aim to screen and identify high-risk youth, whereas our review was focused on interventions for youth that are already determined to be at high-risk (for reviews of prevention programs: see Katz et al., 2013; Robinson et al., 2013).”
BackgroundLink, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_25 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, J., Cox, G., Malone, A., Williamson, M., Baldwin, G., Fletcher, K., & O’Brien, M.
- Venue
- Crisis
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2013-05-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 164-182
- ISSN
- 0227-5910 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-2396
- OpenAlex
- W2000856065
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review of School-Based Interventions Aimed at Preventing, Treating, and Responding to Suicide- Related Behavior in Young People. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1027/0227-5910/a000168
- The paper
- Robinson, J., Cox, G., Malone, A., Williamson, M., Baldwin, G., Fletcher, K., & O’Brien, M. (2013). A Systematic Review of School-Based Interventions Aimed at Preventing, Treating, and Responding to Suicide- Related Behavior in Young People. Crisis. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
