Cited by 324Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEmotions and Moral Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)

Open access
Jermann, Françoise, Van der Linden, Martial, d'Acremont, Mathieu, Zermatten, Ariane·2006·European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to validate a French version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). A sample of 224 young adults completed the French translation of the CERQ and the Beck Depression Inventory II. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed that a nine-factor model also explained the data collected with the French version. Internal reliability scores for each strategy ranged from .68 to .87. As in the original version, we found that the emotion regulation strategies could be grouped into adaptive and less adaptive cognitive regulation strategies. In addition, we observed that Self-blame and Rumination are key cognitive regulation strategies predicting whether high or low depressive symptoms are reported.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.126

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.358 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Schermelleh-Engel K., 2003, Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 323

Metadata

Authors
Jermann, F., Van der Linden, M., d'Acremont, M., & Zermatten, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Cognitive Psychopathology and Neuropsychology Unit, FPSE, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Venue
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2006-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
126-131
ISSN
  • 1015-5759 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2426
OpenAlex
W2155665876
Cited by
324
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, emotion regulation strategies, cognitive emotion regulation, French translation, psychometric validation, factor structure, self-blame, rumination, depressive symptoms, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review