Cited by 1,039Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire

Garnefski, Nadia, Kraaij, Vivian·2007·European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Abstract. The psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) as well as its prospective relationships with symptoms of depression and anxiety were studied in an adult general population sample. The results showed that the CERQ had good factorial validity and high reliabilities, with Cronbach's αs ranging between .75 and .87. In addition, the cognitive emotion regulation strategies accounted for considerable amounts of variance in emotional problems and strong relationships were found between the cognitive strategies self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing and positive reappraisal (inversely) and symptoms of depression and anxiety, both at first measurement and at follow-up. The CERQ might therefore be considered a valuable and reliable tool in the study of individual risk and protective factors associated with emotional problems, while providing us with important targets for intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2007-01
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
141-149
ISSN
  • 1015-5759 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2426
OpenAlex
W2142134948
Cited by
1,039
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, cognitive emotion regulation, emotion regulation strategies, self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing, positive reappraisal, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, emotional problems, psychometric properties, factorial validity, reliability statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review